Keep Your Records Safe

29th November 2018 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

The High Court of Justice is a very expensive place to resolve a family dispute, as is evidenced by a recent case which pitted members of a farming family against each other: it shows beyond doubt the importance of documenting decisions and retaining the evidence of them.

The dispute was over a farm and bungalow, valued together at more than £1.5 million. The difference of opinion was simple. The farm was operated as a partnership between the farmer and his son. When the farmer died, his will left his estate to his widow. The son argued that the farm and bungalow had been transferred into the farming partnership, so they should have been dealt with in the dissolution of the partnership, not through the administration of his father’s estate.

There was no dispute that other land used by the father and son was owned by the partnership, but the family denied that the farm and bungalow, which were owned by the farmer before he took his son into partnership, had ever been partnership property. There was neither sufficient documentation nor proof of intention to agree that the assets in question had been passed into the partnership, so the judge relied on evidence that was largely based on memories of events that happened many years ago. This was critical, because such evidence is notoriously unreliable and the presence of collaborative evidence is normally a fatal flaw.

In ruling that the assets in question were not partnership assets, the judge commented that ‘the evidence of each of the Claimant and his wife and of the First Defendant was flawed. At the very least each of them had allowed their evidence to be coloured by their belief as to what the correct or just outcome should be; by their belief as to what ought to have happened; and by a feeling of grievance arising from their beliefs as to the actions or failings of the other side. I take account of the fact that the witnesses were giving evidence about matters which had taken place over a period of time and that some of the relevant events and dealings were more than thirty years ago. In those circumstances it is not surprising that some of the details were unclear and imprecise. However, I have concluded that these witnesses had lost objectivity and a sense of proportion.’

Source: Concious

Latest News

International Dimension Makes Child Travel Risky

24th April, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

The welfare of children is always top of the list of priorities of the Family Court when making arrangements following the break-up of a family. This can be especially difficult where the parents are from different countries, as shown by a recent case in which the Court considered the welfare of a child of a Mexican mother and an English father. When the child, aged seven, had expressed a wish to return to live in Mexico, the CAFCASS official appointed as the child's guardian recommended that this did not occur....

Is IHT Simplification On the Way?

18th April, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

More than 550,000 people die annually in the UK and half of those deaths require the completion of Inheritance Tax (IHT) forms, which are not straightforward and can be a daunting burden at a difficult time for families. However, only 5 per cent of estates actually end up paying IHT. When there is an IHT liability, the average sum payable is about 20 per cent (the IHT rate is 40 per cent) of estates between £1 million and £9 million, but then falls to an effective rate of half that...

Fake Will Admission May Lead to Criminal Charges

15th April, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

When your spouse's lack of attention to making a will causes issues, faking one is definitely not a good idea, as a Kent woman found out recently. Her husband died in 2013 leaving various properties in Spain and a flat in England, but no will. The woman admitted to faking her late husband's will, which she had used to obtain a grant of probate and to sell the Spanish properties. She bought a property in London with some of the proceeds and moved into it with her stepson and his wife. When...

High Court Decision Underlines the Finality of Divorce Arbitration Awards

12th April, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

Divorcing couples can sometimes achieve savings of both time and money by opting for arbitration, rather than court proceedings, as a means of resolving any financial disputes. However, as a guideline High Court case underlined, arbitration has its potential downsides and it is vital to remember that arbitrators' decisions are generally treated as final. Faced with the prospect of having to wait several months for a court date following the breakdown of their ten-year marriage, a middle-aged couple chose to submit their differences to an arbitrator. He decided that the...