Keep Your Records Safe

29th November 2018 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

The High Court of Justice is a very expensive place to resolve a family dispute, as is evidenced by a recent case which pitted members of a farming family against each other: it shows beyond doubt the importance of documenting decisions and retaining the evidence of them.

The dispute was over a farm and bungalow, valued together at more than £1.5 million. The difference of opinion was simple. The farm was operated as a partnership between the farmer and his son. When the farmer died, his will left his estate to his widow. The son argued that the farm and bungalow had been transferred into the farming partnership, so they should have been dealt with in the dissolution of the partnership, not through the administration of his father’s estate.

There was no dispute that other land used by the father and son was owned by the partnership, but the family denied that the farm and bungalow, which were owned by the farmer before he took his son into partnership, had ever been partnership property. There was neither sufficient documentation nor proof of intention to agree that the assets in question had been passed into the partnership, so the judge relied on evidence that was largely based on memories of events that happened many years ago. This was critical, because such evidence is notoriously unreliable and the presence of collaborative evidence is normally a fatal flaw.

In ruling that the assets in question were not partnership assets, the judge commented that ‘the evidence of each of the Claimant and his wife and of the First Defendant was flawed. At the very least each of them had allowed their evidence to be coloured by their belief as to what the correct or just outcome should be; by their belief as to what ought to have happened; and by a feeling of grievance arising from their beliefs as to the actions or failings of the other side. I take account of the fact that the witnesses were giving evidence about matters which had taken place over a period of time and that some of the relevant events and dealings were more than thirty years ago. In those circumstances it is not surprising that some of the details were unclear and imprecise. However, I have concluded that these witnesses had lost objectivity and a sense of proportion.’

Source: Concious

Latest News

Leaving Your ISA to Your Family

13th December, 2018 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

Individual Savings Accounts (ISAs) have many advantages over normal savings accounts – chiefly that the investment income earned on them is tax free and gains within them are not subject to Capital Gains Tax. They are, not surprisingly, widely regarded as a staple tool in the financial planning toolbox. A UK resident can invest up to £20,000 each tax year in an ISA. However, there are disadvantages, one of which is that ISAs are always held by one individual and cannot be held jointly. This means that on death, an...

Your Home May Be Your Castle But Planning Rules Must Be Obeyed

12th December, 2018 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

The widespread belief that 'an Englishman's home is his castle' can all too easily lead the unwary into breaching planning rules. That was certainly so in a case concerning a householder who found herself in serious trouble after splitting her home into two self-contained residential units without planning permission. The woman had built a side-extension to her semi-detached urban home and was authorised to use it as a guest bedroom with an en suite bathroom and a play area. Kitchen facilities were, however, at some stage added and the extension,...

Capital and Income Losses Mean Different Things for Tax

10th December, 2018 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

When an investment is made in a capital asset that subsequently becomes valueless, the loss can normally be used to reduce future liabilities to Capital Gains Tax when a capital asset is sold at a profit. There are also rules which permit trading expenses and losses to be set against other income for Income Tax (IT) purposes, reducing the IT liability. When a businessman lent his father's skip-hire business money that the latter was unable to repay, he claimed IT deductions for the resultant bad debts, which totalled more than £147,000. The...

Child Contact Disputes Can Be Defused by Mediation – But Take Advice Soon

7th December, 2018 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

If parents engaged in child contact disputes take up entrenched positions, it is very nearly always the child that suffers most. Such disputes can often be defused by taking legal advice at an early stage in order to promote dialogue and an amicable resolution. In one case where this did not happen, a father ended up being banned from having any direct contact with his nine-year-old daughter. Since the parents' separation, the girl had lived exclusively with her mother, who had married another man. During five years of relentless litigation,...