Judge upholds Will in dementia dispute

2nd January 2020 By

For a Will to be valid, the testator (the one making the Will) must be ‘of sound mind’ at the time of making and signing the Will. This means that they must be capable of understanding and approving of the contents and effects of the Will.

With health conditions such as dementia becoming an increasing issue for our ageing population, this can present a problem when making a Will. If a testator is diagnosed with dementia before or shortly after making a Will, this can provide potential grounds for a challenge to the Will when they pass away.

However, as a recent court case shows, the type and severity of the dementia experienced by the testator is critical, meaning a Will made when then testator is experiencing dementia will not necessarily be considered invalid if the matter comes before a judge.

The case involved a dispute over the estate of a woman, Beryl Parsonage, who passed away in November 2015, leaving behind four adult children and eight grandchildren. Mrs Parsonage had made two very different Wills, which were the subject of the dispute between her children.

In the first Will, created in 2010, the woman left her home to one of her children (Duncan Parsonage) and smaller gifts to her other children (Alison Taylor, Sian Folley and Ian Parsonage) and one of her grandchildren (Duncan’s only child). The second Will, created in 2011, divided the estate equally amongst the testator’s four children.

Both Wills were drafted by a solicitor and properly witnessed, but Duncan (who had lost out under the newer Will) contested the validity of the second Will on the basis that, at the time it was made, his mother was suffering from dementia.

When the matter came before the High Court of Justice in Birmingham following a three-year legal battle, the judge, His Honour Judge Barker QC, ruled that the 2011 Will was valid. Judge Barker found that the dementia Mrs Parsonage had been experiencing was relatively mild at the time when the Will was made and therefore that she had been capable of making sound decisions about the contents of her Will.

Having ruled that the 2011 Will was valid, the judge also order than Duncan was ordered to pay his brother Ian’s legal costs of £152,500, with this to be charged against Duncan’s share of the inheritance from their mother’s estate.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...