fbpx

Inveterate Trespasser Rightly Jailed for Contempt, Court of Appeal Rules

16th October 2019 By Arman Khosravi

It is in the nature of litigation that the losing party frequently feels that the judge was wrong and the outcome unjust. However, a case in which a householder repeatedly lost his liberty, and ultimately his home, due to his defiance of court orders shows how important it is to accept judicial decisions and move on.

The man claimed to enjoy an unrestricted right of way on foot over part of the garden of an adjoining property owned by a social housing provider. His arguments to that effect were rejected by a judge, but he refused to accept that outcome and engaged in numerous acts of trespass.

Court orders requiring him to keep off his neighbour’s land had no effect and he had been repeatedly sentenced to jail terms of increasing length for contempt of court. In an attempt to recover its substantial costs of the proceedings, the social housing provider eventually obtained a possession order against him. However, he had refused to leave his home and had continued to trespass as before.

In dismissing his challenge to his most recent, 14-month, prison sentence, the Court of Appeal noted that his relentless acts of trespass had caused alarm and distress to the social housing provider’s tenants. Given his lack of remorse and the absence of any sign of him changing his ways, the Court found that there was nothing excessive about his punishment, which could be viewed as lenient. The Court warned him that if his defiance continued, he could look forward to further loss of liberty.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...