fbpx

Interpreting Wills That May Be Ambiguous – High Court Guidance

17th May 2022 By

Even with the most careful drafting, there is always a risk that a will may be capable of bearing more than one meaning. In resolving a family inheritance dispute, the High Court considered the extent to which extraneous evidence of a will-maker’s intentions can be used as an aid to interpretation of the words actually used.

The case concerned a businessman who, by his will, bequeathed a life interest in his home to his wife if she survived him. In the event, she predeceased him. Following his death, an issue arose as to whether the property should be held on trust for his son alone or whether it should pass into his residuary estate, which stood to be divided equally between his son and his daughter.

The daughter argued that, on a correct reading of the will, the trust in favour of her brother only arose if their father died before their mother. The son asserted that his father had told him on numerous occasions that he would in due course inherit the house. The true interpretation of the will, he argued, was that the property was held on trust for him, whichever of his parents died first.

Employing conventional rules of interpretation, the Court ruled in favour of the son’s reading of the will. That interpretation accorded with other provisions of the will, the overall purpose of the document, common sense and the natural and ordinary meaning of the words used.

The Court noted that the son’s interpretation aligned with the businessman’s very clear instructions to the solicitor who drafted the will. Whilst anxious that his wife should be able to continue living in the house if she survived him, extraneous evidence established his plain intention that his son would eventually inherit the property, come what may. Had the wording of the will been ambiguous, the Court would have rectified its terms in order to achieve that outcome.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Inheritance – Daughter's Lies Trigger Rare Finding of Fraudulent Calumny

22nd June, 2022 By

Sick and vulnerable people can be prone to the malign, even fraudulent, influence of relatives or others who are intent on maximising their inheritance. However, as a High Court case showed, such conduct is unlikely to go undetected. The case concerned a man who was suffering from leukaemia when he died at the age of 92. Less than a month before he passed away, he made a will by which he bequeathed almost the whole of his estate to his daughter and her partner. He left only his cars and...

What is an 'Annoyance'? High Court Defines the Correct Legal Test

16th June, 2022 By

Restrictive covenants that forbid property owners from causing annoyance, nuisance or disturbance to their neighbours commonly appear in title deeds – but how are they to be interpreted? In the context of a dispute between residents of a housing estate, the High Court gave authoritative guidance on that issue. Properties on the estate were subject to a covenant prohibiting their owners from doing anything that would or might be, or grow to be, an annoyance, nuisance or disturbance to other residents. Despite opposition from their neighbours, a couple who lived...

Double Taxation Treaties – Wealthy South African Relieved of £10 Million Bill

13th June, 2022 By

Rich individuals often have their feet firmly planted in more than one country and that can give rise to disputes as to where they should be taxed. In a guideline case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) considered the position of an extremely wealthy man with extensive ties to both the UK and the Republic of South Africa. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) argued that the man was liable for Income Tax in respect of more than £20 million that he received from a family trust during five tax years. He asserted...

Family Judge Labours to Achieve Fairness Between Debt-Laden Divorcees

10th June, 2022 By

So-called 'big money' divorces may grab the headlines, but lower-value disputes can often be the hardest to resolve. In a case on point, a family judge laboured to meet the reasonable needs of a divorcing couple whose debts far exceeded their modest savings. The couple's marriage lasted almost 30 years, yielding three children who had grown to adulthood. Whilst the wife worked full time, the father's primary role was that of a stay-at-home parent, looking after the home and children. They lived in a housing association property and, although they...