International Litigation Poses Challenges That Make Legal Advice Essential

11th January 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

Modern litigation spans the globe and issues concerning cross-border service of documents and jurisdiction often raise difficulties that make specialist legal advice essential. That was certainly so in a High Court privacy case with a strong international flavour.

A doctor launched a claim for damages, alleging misuse of private information and harassment against a man who he feared was intent on publishing private details about him on a website. He obtained an emergency pre-trial injunction that forbade such publication. However, the man subsequently argued that he had not been properly served with the proceedings and that the matter in any event fell outside the proper jurisdiction of the English courts.

When served with the proceedings by email, the man was in Switzerland. However, in ruling on the matter, the Court noted that the UK and Switzerland are signatories to the Convention on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters 2007 (the Lugano Convention).

Although the doctor had lived and worked in South-East Asia for some years, he was a British national and the Court was satisfied that he had a good arguable case that his centre of interests remained in the UK, where he had spent most of his career and adult life. It was also strongly arguable that online publication of the relevant private information would amount to a substantial wrong in the UK. The requirements of the Lugano Convention having been met, the Court had jurisdiction.

Service of the proceedings by email on the man when he was in Switzerland did not achieve compliance with the Hague Service Convention, nor had the Court’s permission been sought for service by that method. However, the Court took the unusual step of regularising the position by retrospectively authorising service by email. The doctor’s lawyers had believed that the man was in England when the email was sent and it was clear that it had brought the proceedings very effectively to his attention. In the circumstances, the man’s application to set aside service and discharge the interim injunction was dismissed.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Disinheriting Relatives Can Be a Recipe for Discord

21st March, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

You may have good reasons for writing close relatives out of your will but, as any lawyer will tell you, the consequence of doing so can be family discord after you are gone. That was certainly so in one case concerning a father who disinherited his daughter by his first marriage. The man's will left the whole of his estate to his second wife and appointed her and one of his nieces as his executors. In a statement attached to the will he explained that he was leaving nothing to...

Tribunal Paves the Way for Suburban Garden Development

18th March, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

Restrictions on land use appear in the title deeds of many properties – but the law permits their deletion or modification if they become obsolete over time or stand in the way of reasonable development. Exactly that happened in one case in which the Upper Tribunal (UT) opened the way for construction of three new homes in a large suburban garden despite neighbours' objections. The garden once formed a large field on the outskirts of a major city. Part of it was subject to a restrictive covenant, dated 1928, which...

Commercial Surrogacies Abroad Are Not Illegal – Court of Appeal Ruling

15th March, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

Although commercial surrogacy businesses have long been banned in the UK, the Court of Appeal recently ruled that a clinical negligence victim would not be breaking the law were she to enter into such an arrangement in California, where a more liberal surrogacy regime prevails. The woman is unable to have children after she developed cervical cancer and had to undergo radical surgery. The NHS trust that was responsible for her treatment was ordered by a judge to pay her almost £600,000 in compensation after it admitted that four opportunities...

Social Media – Be Careful!

12th March, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

The legal dispute between Elon Musk and Vernon Unsworth, the man who helped to rescue boys trapped in a cave in Thailand, may have dropped out of the press over the last few weeks, but a recent case shows the lack of accuracy of Mr Musk's assertion that Twitter was just the forum for a 'schoolyard spat' that would not be taken seriously by users who expect to read 'opinion, not facts'. The case involved a tweet made by the agent of a former chairman of UKIP in the run...