Inheritance Tax Mitigation Scheme Ends in Abject Failure

17th April 2020 By

If offered the opportunity to shelter their homes against future Inheritance Tax (IHT) liabilities whilst retaining the right to live in them rent free, most people would jump at the chance. However, as one case strikingly showed, that holy grail of tax planning is extraordinarily hard to achieve.

The case concerned a widower with three children who entered into a scheme which was designed to reduce future IHT liabilities. In essence, it involved the purported sale of his home for £1.4 million to a trust of which he was one of the trustees. He purportedly lent the money to the trust in order to fund the purchase and subsequently assigned his right to repayment of the loan to his children.

Following his death, the executors of his will frankly acknowledged that the objective of the scheme was to remove the value of the property from his estate for IHT purposes, whilst enabling him to continue living in it rent free for life. HM Revenue and Customs, however, took the view that the scheme was ineffective and raised an IHT demand against his estate totalling £560,000.

In rejecting the executors’ challenge to that decision, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) noted that, after the scheme was put in place, legal title to the property remained registered in the widower’s name and he was still living in it when he died. He did not, at the relevant time, have £1.4 million to lend to the trust. The sale and loan agreements had a sense of unreality about them and there had never been any intention to honour them in practice.

The FTT found that both agreements, together with the loan assignment, were void from the outset. On that basis, the property, which was worth £2.95 million when the widower died, formed part of his estate and was subject to IHT.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Challenge to Will's Validity Rejected by High Court

12th April, 2024 By

The best way to ensure your assets will be distributed as you wish is to have your will professionally drafted by a qualified solicitor. In a recent case, a challenge to the validity of an elderly man's will was dismissed by the High Court. The man had previously made a will in 2011, leaving most of his estate equally to his three children. In 2018, by which time one of his sons had predeceased him, he made a further will, leaving the residue of his estate to his other son...

Defiance of Family Court Orders Will Always End Badly

10th April, 2024 By

Custodial sentences very rarely come into play in the family courts. Where there have been repeated breaches of court orders, however, judges may have little choice but to clamp down. This was illustrated in the High Court during committal proceedings that stemmed from a child custody dispute. The background to the case involved contested proceedings between the father and mother of a young child. These concluded with a court order establishing that the child – a daughter – would live with the mother. Three months later the daughter travelled with...

Claim for SDLT Relief on Annex Unsuccessful

8th April, 2024 By

When buying a property consisting of more than one residence, it may be possible to claim multiple dwellings relief (MDR) against Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT). However, there are certain conditions that must be met for an MDR claim to succeed, as a recent case illustrates. A property was purchased for £1.8 million. Prior to the purchase, the buyer had agreed with the seller that he would be allowed to carry out works to construct a self-contained annex at the property. The buyer's SDLT return included a claim for MDR...

Divorce – Alleged Bigamy Raised in Financial Remedies Dispute

5th April, 2024 By

The issue of bigamy and its potential impact on a person's ability to seek financial remedies in a divorce came under the legal spotlight recently. A husband made an application to strike out his wife's financial remedies claim on the basis that she had committed bigamy and deceived him into a marriage when she knew she was not free to marry. This deceit, he claimed, was so egregious that, as a matter of public policy, she should be debarred from pursuing any claim for financial remedies against him. The husband based...