In Dispute With a Neighbour? Legal Advice Can Help Draw the Sting

1st May 2020 By

Disputes with neighbours have a way of getting horribly out of hand, but legal advice taken at an early stage can help to draw the venom and save incalculable heartache and money in the long run. A case on point concerned flat dwellers who for years engaged in a titanic struggle over a few feet of garden.

The dispute centred on the small front garden of a semi-detached house which had been split into two flats. It included a lightwell area, which enabled the sun’s rays to penetrate the lower flat. That area had long been the focus of acrimony between the owner of the lower flat, who also owned the building’s freehold, and the long leaseholder of the upper flat.

After the freeholder carried out extensive works – which involved lowering the level of the lightwell and installing French windows – the tenant of the upper flat launched proceedings. In ruling on the matter, a judge noted that, given the long-standing differences between the two men and the strength of feeling involved, their oral evidence had proved of little or no assistance in resolving the issues.

The judge found that, on a true interpretation of the tenant’s lease, the lightwell fell within his property. The freeholder argued without success that he had agreed with a previous tenant of the upper flat that the boundary would be changed, leaving him in lawful possession of the lightwell.

The works carried out by the freeholder thus amounted to an act of trespass which had dispossessed the tenant of the lightwell. The tenant was thus in principle entitled to an order requiring, amongst other things, reinstatement of the lightwell to its pre-works condition and its return to his possession. The judge, however, found that a financial remedy represented a fairer outcome on the particular facts of the case and ordered the freeholder to pay the tenant £24,900 in damages.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...