If HMRC Don't Get it Right

9th January 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

You may be forgiven for thinking that the authorities always follow proper procedures, but that is not the case, and when they fail, their actions may not be legally valid.

In a recent case, a series of errors put a taxpayer and HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) at loggerheads in the Tax Tribunal, with the result that HMRC’s penalty assessments were partly cancelled.

In April 2016, the taxpayer had received a notice requiring her to file a tax return. She did so the following October, but it was inadvertently signed not by her but by her husband. HMRC rejected the return and advised her that they would not levy a penalty if it was refiled within 21 days…that was in December 2016. She eventually filed the return in March 2017.

The penalties levied for late filing of the return totalled £530 and the Tribunal agreed that there were no special circumstances that would justify cancelling them; nor was there any ‘reasonable excuse’ for the return being late. However, the penalties were (nearly) cancelled, because the notice she was sent requiring her to file the return could not be shown to have been issued ‘by an officer of the board’, as required by the legislation, but had been computer-generated. The original notice to file a return was therefore invalid.

However, the notice sent in December 2016 rejecting the incorrectly signed return had been signed by an HMRC employee and was therefore valid. A penalty for failing to comply with that notice, which was due because the return was more than three months late, was therefore correct and the revised penalty was accordingly fixed at £100.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Motor Insurers Not Liable for £2 Million Fire Damage

27th June, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

The law requires that the driver of any vehicle has a valid insurance policy that covers injury or damage to third parties caused by or arising out of the use of the vehicle on a road or in a public place. The Supreme Court has given authoritative guidance on the meaning of that phrase in a case of crucial importance to vehicle owners and the insurance industry. The case concerned an employee of an engineering firm, the owners of which allowed him to use the premises to do work on...

Ignore Court Orders At Your Peril

24th June, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

A wealthy Omani man who failed to pay to his ex-wife the financial settlement ordered by the court, or to cooperate with disclosure orders, faces arrest if he attempts to return to the UK. When the couple's marriage broke up, they were divorced under Omani law. However, the wife, a resident of the UK, sought and obtained orders in the UK court for financial relief (under Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984) for herself and their children, who live with her. The divorce took place in 2017...

Failure to Challenge Repaving Results in Loss of Title

20th June, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

Failing to take active steps to protect your land from use by another can produce unfortunate effects, as a couple from York discovered recently. The couple own a bungalow which has a front driveway adjacent to that of the next-door bungalow – a common design. The two effectively blend into one before reaching the road. In 1986 their neighbour repaved her drive with new paving tiles and brick edging, and in so doing went across the boundary line between the two properties. She parked her car on the area and...

Just Because You Agree Doesn't Mean the Court Will

18th June, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

It is common in legal disputes for the two sides to agree to suspend the court proceedings for a period so that they can get as much agreed between them as possible, and gather their evidence and prepare their arguments over what remains in dispute without the pressure of an impending hearing date. Such an agreement is called a 'standstill agreement', and if proceedings are served in time it is usual for the court to agree to the requested hiatus. In a recent family law case, one of the UK's...