fbpx

Highly Regarded Artist's Death Triggers Court Battle Over His Legacy

13th September 2022 By

When people die, it is the duty of the administrators of their estates to gather in their assets and distribute them to those entitled to inherit them. As a case concerning the contents of a deceased artist’s flat showed, however, that task is by no means always a straightforward one.

Following the highly regarded artist’s death, the administrator of his estate – his brother – sought possession of the numerous works of art and other potentially valuable items that belonged to him. Many such artefacts were believed to be contained in a flat the artist had shared with his partner.

After discussions came to nothing and the partner declined access to the flat or to hand over relevant artefacts in his possession, the administrator lodged a claim against him, alleging wrongful interference with goods. Interim orders were twice obtained requiring him to deliver up the artefacts.

The first order was not complied with after the partner claimed to have COVID-19. When solicitors, accompanied by workmen and the police, attended the flat with a view to executing the second order, the partner was adamant that he was not going to allow them in to remove the artefacts. Faced with that impasse, the administrator applied for a finding of contempt of court against him.

When the partner failed to attend the hearing of that application, the High Court issued a bench warrant for his arrest. If that did not succeed in enforcing his attendance, the Court anticipated hearing the application in his absence. If found in contempt, he would face a maximum penalty of an unlimited fine or two years’ imprisonment.

The partner having failed to acknowledge service of the wrongful interference claim, the Court entered a default judgment against him and made a final order requiring him to immediately deliver up any of the artist’s possessions under his power or control. He was also required to provide information concerning the whereabouts of any artefacts that may have been removed from the flat and to pay the administrator’s legal costs, summarily assessed at over £60,000.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Tenants Can Purchase Freehold When Landlord Cannot Be Found

11th June, 2024 By

The Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 gives qualifying leaseholders the right to join together to buy the freehold of their properties – a process known as collective enfranchisement. A recent case demonstrated that this right can be exercised even when the landlord cannot be found. The leaseholders of two flats in a terraced house wished to purchase it from the landlord, but were unable to ascertain his whereabouts and therefore could not serve notice on him under Section 13 of the Act. They therefore applied for an...

Court Refuses to Set Aside Divorce Order Applied for by Mistake

6th June, 2024 By

While the courts have a range of powers to set aside orders, they will only exercise them in limited circumstances. In a somewhat surprising case that has attracted much comment, the High Court declined to set aside a final order of divorce that had been applied for by mistake. A couple separated in January 2023, after more than 21 years of marriage. In October that year, while financial remedy proceedings were still ongoing, the wife's legal representatives inadvertently applied for a final order of divorce in respect of her instead...

Waiting Time for Grants of Probate Falls

3rd June, 2024 By

Following concerns last year about delays in processing probate applications, recent figures from HM Courts and Tribunals Service show that waiting times for grants of probate are continuing to improve. The average time from submission of a probate application to probate being granted fell to 11.3 weeks in March 2024, a decrease from 13.7 weeks in February and 13.8 weeks in January. This is the lowest figure since March 2023, when the average was 10.8 weeks. The longest waiting time since then was in November, at 15.8 weeks: that month,...

Late Appeal Against Tax Penalties Rejected

31st May, 2024 By

It is incumbent on taxpayers to make sure they fully comply with their obligations to file returns and pay any tax due. The point was illustrated by a recent case in which a taxpayer whose return had not been received by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) failed to persuade the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) that he should be permitted to appeal against the resulting penalties. On the evening of 31 January 2014, the man had completed his 2012/13 Income Tax return on HMRC's website. Shortly afterwards he went to Cyprus, and...