High Court Aids Widow Left in Precarious Position by Husband's Death

7th January 2022 By

If someone on whom you depended for support has died without making reasonable financial provision for you, you should consult a solicitor without delay. In a case on point, the High Court came to the aid of a widow who was left largely reliant on benefits following her husband’s death.

Prior to his death, the husband made a will bequeathing the whole of his estate to his widow. Their matrimonial home was, however, owned equally by the husband and one of his brothers as joint tenants. When the husband died, his interest in the property fell outside his estate and passed to his brother automatically under the principle of survivorship. As a result, the brother became the property’s sole owner and no part of it passed to the widow.

The widow and her child remained living in the property, but their position was precarious. Although she had inherited a modest investment property from her husband, it was subject to a substantial mortgage and she needed the rental income it generated to cover its costs. She testified that she had few other resources and was otherwise dependent on benefits.

After she launched proceedings under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, the Court found that the husband had failed to make reasonable provision for her as his financial dependant. The most obvious and primary claim on his estate was to provide for his wife and child and, in particular, to ensure that they had a home to live in.

The Court directed that the husband’s half share of the matrimonial home should revert to his estate to the extent necessary to yield a cash sum of £80,000 that would be paid to his widow. That would be sufficient to discharge the mortgage on the investment property, leaving it free for occupation by the widow and her child.

If she was unable to take on paid work, the widow’s dependence on benefits was likely to continue. However, the Court noted that its order would improve her position in rendering her the unencumbered owner of the investment property. The Court hoped that its ruling would alleviate friction between the widow and members of the husband’s family.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Litigation – You Need a Lawyer to Navigate the Procedural Minefield

27th January, 2022 By

The litigation process can, to a non-lawyer, appear to be a maze of procedural rules replete with traps for the unwary. In one case, a woman's claim against a builder went wrong almost from the start when she failed to pay a court fee on time. Following a trial, the builder, who had worked on her property, was ordered to pay the woman £10,920 in damages. His appeal against that decision was, however, subsequently upheld by a judge on the basis that the woman's delay in paying a £545 trial...

Late Payment of Tax – There Is Such a Thing as a Reasonable Excuse

24th January, 2022 By

Those who pay their taxes late can expect punishment – but there is such a thing as a reasonable excuse. In one case, a man who failed to notify the tax authorities of his obligation to pay the High Income Child Benefit Charge was relieved of financial penalties by the First-tier Tribunal (FTT). Over a period of about five years, during which his annual earnings were in excess of £50,000, the man should have paid the charge. He failed to notify HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) of his liability. He...

Facing a Bank's Formal Demand for Payment? You Are Not Powerless

21st January, 2022 By

When faced with a bank's formal demand for payment, individual debtors can feel that there is little they can do but comply. However, as a High Court ruling showed, with the right legal advice they are very far from powerless. A bank served a man with a statutory demand requiring payment of £236,538. Such demands are frequently a precursor to bankruptcy proceedings. The man was said to owe the sum under loan facilities that had been entered into more than eight years previously. The demand was, however, set aside by...

Ambiguous Wills – Court of Appeal Gives Effect to Deceased's Intentions

18th January, 2022 By

Where words used in a will are ambiguous, judges will strive to interpret them in a way that gives effect to the deceased's intentions. An instructive Court of Appeal decision on point hinged on the little-known fact that the Channel Islands are not formally part of the United Kingdom. The case concerned a man who, at the date of his death, owned assets in Russia, England and Jersey. By his will, he left all his 'UK assets' to his children. After his death, an issue arose between the children and...