Grenfell Tower Inquiry Summary Report

1st October 2020 By Arman Khosravi

Oliver Fisher Solicitors are currently instructed in the Grenfell Tower Inquiry led by Sir Martin Moore-Bick, which is examining the catastrophic fire in June 2017 which claimed 72 lives and injured many others. The Inquiry opened in September 2017 and is now in its second phase.

The first phase of the Inquiry examined events on the night of the fire. Evidence was heard from survivors, emergency services personnel, survivors of the fire and bereaved family members. Phase 1 of the Inquiry investigated how the fire started, how it spread, and the response of emergency services.

The phase one report was published, which made recommendations to the central government, and contained criticisms of several organisations, including London Fire Brigade. The government has said that it will implement the measures recommended by Sir Martin Moore-Bick but has not yet done so.

The second phase of the Inquiry began in February 2020 with the purpose of examining events leading up to the fire. This includes the refurbishment of the building, testing of the cladding, building regulations, and the role of central and local government.

Difficulties arose at the beginning of Phase 2, after one of the panel members selected to assist the Chairman was found to have connections with the firm which manufactured and supplied the cladding used on Grenfell Tower.

The Inquiry was then delayed whilst the Attorney General considered and approved an application from some of the corporate core participants, who sought an undertaking that anything said by an individual witness could not be used against them in future criminal proceedings.

In March 2020, the Inquiry was suspended due to COVID-19. A small number of hearings were held in late July, but it was not until 7 September 2020 that phase two of the Inquiry recommenced in full, albeit with remote attendance for all but the Inquiry team.

So far the September hearings have heard evidence from construction firms who worked on Grenfell Tower, including Rydon, the company contracted to undertake the refurbishment work on the building, and Harley, the facades specialist subcontracted by Rydon to design and install the external cladding, and ending with RBKC Building Control being questioned from the end of September.

Oliver Fisher Solicitors’ team for the Grenfell Tower Inquiry is led by Arfan Bhatti. If you are seeking legal advice or representation for an ongoing or future Inquiry, please contact Mr Bhatti here.


Latest News

Challenge to Will's Validity Rejected by High Court

12th April, 2024 By

The best way to ensure your assets will be distributed as you wish is to have your will professionally drafted by a qualified solicitor. In a recent case, a challenge to the validity of an elderly man's will was dismissed by the High Court. The man had previously made a will in 2011, leaving most of his estate equally to his three children. In 2018, by which time one of his sons had predeceased him, he made a further will, leaving the residue of his estate to his other son...

Defiance of Family Court Orders Will Always End Badly

10th April, 2024 By

Custodial sentences very rarely come into play in the family courts. Where there have been repeated breaches of court orders, however, judges may have little choice but to clamp down. This was illustrated in the High Court during committal proceedings that stemmed from a child custody dispute. The background to the case involved contested proceedings between the father and mother of a young child. These concluded with a court order establishing that the child – a daughter – would live with the mother. Three months later the daughter travelled with...

Claim for SDLT Relief on Annex Unsuccessful

8th April, 2024 By

When buying a property consisting of more than one residence, it may be possible to claim multiple dwellings relief (MDR) against Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT). However, there are certain conditions that must be met for an MDR claim to succeed, as a recent case illustrates. A property was purchased for £1.8 million. Prior to the purchase, the buyer had agreed with the seller that he would be allowed to carry out works to construct a self-contained annex at the property. The buyer's SDLT return included a claim for MDR...

Divorce – Alleged Bigamy Raised in Financial Remedies Dispute

5th April, 2024 By

The issue of bigamy and its potential impact on a person's ability to seek financial remedies in a divorce came under the legal spotlight recently. A husband made an application to strike out his wife's financial remedies claim on the basis that she had committed bigamy and deceived him into a marriage when she knew she was not free to marry. This deceit, he claimed, was so egregious that, as a matter of public policy, she should be debarred from pursuing any claim for financial remedies against him. The husband based...