fbpx

Good News for Airline Passengers as 'In Writing' Clause Overcome

14th September 2018 By Arman Khosravi

Almost everyone who has flown much has a story (or more than one) about lost or damaged luggage, and holiday insurance claims regarding these are commonplace.

A Finnish man who took a holiday to Malaga found that some items went missing from his luggage on the return trip and he proceeded to make a claim against his insurance policy. He had used Finnair’s website to see what to do and concluded that he could telephone their customer helpline to report the matter.

Finnair refused to settle with the insurer because the regulations in the Montreal Convention (which covers airline traffic) stipulate that such losses must be reported in writing within seven days of the receipt of the luggage. There was no doubt that the airline had a written record of the claim, but as notification of the loss was not made in writing, it declined to settle.

The legal argument that ensued went all the way to the Court of Justice of the European Union, which ruled that the claim was valid because a representative of Finnair had made a record of it. The Court also ruled that the use of an electronic system (such as a website complaints page) would count as a formal written complaint.

However, given that the decision turned on there being a written record of the claim, it would be risky to rely on a verbal complaint only as it is important to make sure that a written record is held by the carrier within the seven-day time limit.

Source: Concious

Latest News

High Court Grants Parental Order Despite Previous Adoption

18th April, 2024 By

In law, adopted children are regarded as having been born to their adoptive parents. The Family Division of the High Court recently considered whether that fact precluded a parental order being granted under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (HFEA) in respect of a child born via surrogacy. A couple who lived in the USA had entered into a surrogacy arrangement with another woman. An adoption order naming the couple as the child's parents had been made by a US court and was automatically recognised under UK law. However,...

Flat Owner Not Liable for Pre-existing Structural Issues

16th April, 2024 By

When building owners carry out works on their property, are they liable for damage to adjoining properties that results from pre-existing structural issues? The Court of Appeal recently provided welcome clarification on that question. The owner of a ground-floor flat wished to extend it by building out into his garden. He served notices on owners of adjoining properties, as required by the Party Wall etc. Act 1996. The works caused the rear wall of two adjoining properties to drop by about 2 mm, which led to internal walls and floor...

Challenge to Will's Validity Rejected by High Court

12th April, 2024 By

The best way to ensure your assets will be distributed as you wish is to have your will professionally drafted by a qualified solicitor. In a recent case, a challenge to the validity of an elderly man's will was dismissed by the High Court. The man had previously made a will in 2011, leaving most of his estate equally to his three children. In 2018, by which time one of his sons had predeceased him, he made a further will, leaving the residue of his estate to his other son...

Defiance of Family Court Orders Will Always End Badly

10th April, 2024 By

Custodial sentences very rarely come into play in the family courts. Where there have been repeated breaches of court orders, however, judges may have little choice but to clamp down. This was illustrated in the High Court during committal proceedings that stemmed from a child custody dispute. The background to the case involved contested proceedings between the father and mother of a young child. These concluded with a court order establishing that the child – a daughter – would live with the mother. Three months later the daughter travelled with...