First Salvo in Bitter Inheritance Dispute Fired Before Deceased Laid to Rest

5th January 2024 By

Making a will when your death is imminent is almost never a good idea and is often a positive invitation to dispute between your loved ones after you are gone. In a case on point, the first salvo in a tragic inheritance dispute was fired even before the deceased could be laid to rest.

Following a family man’s death in his 60s, one of his five children sought possession of his body so that she could make funeral arrangements. She had the backing of her siblings, the man’s mother and other relatives. However, the man’s partner staunchly resisted her claim.

After an urgent hearing, the child was granted an injunction that forbade the partner from taking possession of the body or arranging for its disposal. The partner responded with an application to set the injunction aside. In doing so, she asserted that the man had made a valid will, about three weeks before he died, in which he appointed her daughter as one of his executors.

Ruling on the matter, the High Court noted that the validity of the will, which was apparently signed by way of a fingerprint, was likely to be challenged on various grounds. Amongst other things, it was said that the fingerprint was not that of the deceased and that he lacked the mental capacity required to make a valid will. The disposal of his body was, however, an urgent matter that could not await the resolution of potentially lengthy probate proceedings.

In setting aside the injunction, the Court noted that the will was rational on its face and appeared to have been properly executed in accordance with Section 9 of the Wills Act 1837. In those circumstances, the law presumed, unless proved otherwise, that the will was valid and that the man had the capacity to make it. On that basis, the Court ruled that his partner’s daughter and the other executor named in the will were entitled to take possession of his body and to arrange his funeral.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...