fbpx

Field Owner Sees Off Neighbour's Squatters' Rights Claim

27th December 2019 By

Landowners who neglect or fail to make use of their properties put themselves at risk of losing them to squatters. In a recent case on this subject, a woman faced a neighbour’s claim that he was entitled to her field, having cut the grass for years.

The neighbour alleged that he first entered the field in 2002 in order to pick fruit, and swiftly formed the intention of taking possession of it. He said that he thereafter treated the field as his own. He and his nephew cut down scrub and grass, removed trees and lit bonfires on the property.

In 2017, he applied to the Land Registry to have the field registered in his name on the basis that he had been in continuous possession of it for more than 12 years, thus acquiring adverse possession rights. His application was, however, hotly resisted by the woman and a number of other local residents. The dispute was referred to the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) for resolution.

In ruling on the matter, the FTT noted that there was undisguised animosity between some of the witnesses in the case. The neighbour’s ex-wife was amongst those who gave evidence against him, and there was clearly no love lost between him and the woman who had paper title to the field.

Noting serious inconsistencies in the neighbour’s self-serving evidence, the FTT was swayed by the impressive testimony of a local farmer, who said that he kept sheep on the field until 2009 or 2010. Even on the neighbour’s own case, his use of the field had been essentially covert and he had not made his intention to possess it clear to the world.

The FTT was satisfied that the neighbour only began using the field in 2017. He had at no point taken factual possession of the property, nor had he formed an intention to do so, and he had therefore not acquired so-called ‘squatters’ rights’. The Land Registry was directed to cancel his application.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Challenge to Will's Validity Rejected by High Court

12th April, 2024 By

The best way to ensure your assets will be distributed as you wish is to have your will professionally drafted by a qualified solicitor. In a recent case, a challenge to the validity of an elderly man's will was dismissed by the High Court. The man had previously made a will in 2011, leaving most of his estate equally to his three children. In 2018, by which time one of his sons had predeceased him, he made a further will, leaving the residue of his estate to his other son...

Defiance of Family Court Orders Will Always End Badly

10th April, 2024 By

Custodial sentences very rarely come into play in the family courts. Where there have been repeated breaches of court orders, however, judges may have little choice but to clamp down. This was illustrated in the High Court during committal proceedings that stemmed from a child custody dispute. The background to the case involved contested proceedings between the father and mother of a young child. These concluded with a court order establishing that the child – a daughter – would live with the mother. Three months later the daughter travelled with...

Claim for SDLT Relief on Annex Unsuccessful

8th April, 2024 By

When buying a property consisting of more than one residence, it may be possible to claim multiple dwellings relief (MDR) against Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT). However, there are certain conditions that must be met for an MDR claim to succeed, as a recent case illustrates. A property was purchased for £1.8 million. Prior to the purchase, the buyer had agreed with the seller that he would be allowed to carry out works to construct a self-contained annex at the property. The buyer's SDLT return included a claim for MDR...

Divorce – Alleged Bigamy Raised in Financial Remedies Dispute

5th April, 2024 By

The issue of bigamy and its potential impact on a person's ability to seek financial remedies in a divorce came under the legal spotlight recently. A husband made an application to strike out his wife's financial remedies claim on the basis that she had committed bigamy and deceived him into a marriage when she knew she was not free to marry. This deceit, he claimed, was so egregious that, as a matter of public policy, she should be debarred from pursuing any claim for financial remedies against him. The husband based...