Family Judge Heeds Teenage Foster Child's Wish to Change His Surname

28th June 2022 By

Children do not, as a matter of law, have capacity to make important decisions for themselves – but that does not mean that their wishes and feelings are irrelevant. In an unusual case on point, the High Court gave effect to a teenage foster child’s strongly expressed desire to change his surname.

Social services became involved in the boy’s life a few months after his birth. He was about 10 years old when he was removed from his parents’ care due to concerns relating to emotional and potential physical abuse, domestic violence within the home, parental drug and alcohol abuse and a lack of supervision. After a kinship placement broke down, he was placed with specialist foster carers.

Having reached the age of 15, he was extremely well settled in his foster home and fully integrated into his carers’ family. He had used the carers’ surname at school and in the local community and wanted that position formalised. When he was addressed by officialdom using the surname on his birth certificate – his natural father’s surname – he became uncomfortable and emotionally upset.

His natural mother had maintained contact with him and supported his application to change his surname. His father, from whom he was totally estranged, opposed the application and argued that social workers should have taken steps to prevent him making informal use of his carers’ surname. He pointed out that the boy would be free to change his surname, without judicial intervention, when he reached the age of 18.

Ruling on the matter, the Court noted that the boy had strongly expressed a clear and settled wish to change his surname. He felt firmly established within his foster family and wished to copper-fasten his placement by assuming that family’s surname. He would be at risk of emotional harm were his desired surname not recognised on a legal and formal basis. Despite the father’s objections, there was a compelling case to permit the change of surname and the Court directed that all necessary formal steps be taken to achieve that outcome.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...