fbpx

Exceptional Cases Justify Experimental Care

2nd September 2016 By Arman Khosravi

In a unique decision, which will give hope to people who have family members being denied experimental treatments by the NHS on costs grounds, the NHS has been ordered to provide a pioneering new drug to a teenager whose bright future was threatened by a rare medical condition. Although the treatment would cost up to £13,000 a year, and had not yet been approved for prescription on the NHS, the High Court ruled that it was an exceptional case that deserved funding.

The 17-year-old girl suffers from cataplexy, a condition which causes muscle weakness brought on by emotion. In her case, her knees tend to buckle each time she laughs. She is also stricken by narcolepsy, which means that she constantly falls asleep during the day and can get little rest at night.

None of the usual treatments had worked for the very popular girl, who had lost many of her friends due to her condition. Her hopes of getting into a leading university were in jeopardy and she could no longer take part in games at school. She was gaining weight and the lack of appropriate treatment had caused her emotional and psychological harm. Her lawyers argued that treatment with the American-made drug provided her only chance of returning to a normal life.

In upholding her judicial review challenge, the Court found that NHS England’s refusal to allow her to be prescribed the drug was insupportable. The treatment would be cost effective and her health would be gravely compromised without it. Ordering that she be given the drug on the NHS for a three-month trial period, the Court concluded: "If she is not exceptional, who is?"

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...