Entrepreneurs' Relief and the Definition of 'Trade' – Guideline Ruling

12th July 2022 By

At what point can it be said that an embryonic business has begun to trade? A tax tribunal pondered that fundamental issue in a case concerning a claim for entrepreneurs’ relief on the sale of a nascent business asset.

An investor sold his minority stake in a limited liability partnership (LLP) that was established for the purpose of building and operating a biomass energy plant. His claim for entrepreneurs’ relief – which would have greatly reduced his liability to Capital Gains Tax arising from the sale – was rejected by HM Revenue and Customs.

Ruling on his challenge to that decision, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) noted that the investor was entitled to entrepreneurs’ relief if he could establish that the LLP was engaged in ‘trade’ for a period of 12 months prior to the sale. Trade is defined by Section 989 of the Income Tax Act 2007 as including any venture in the nature of trade.

The sale took place before the Environment Agency issued a permit to operate the plant. Clearance work had started on the disused industrial site, but construction of the plant had yet to commence and it would take about two and a half years of building and commissioning work before it could become operational.

By the time of the sale, however, the LLP had entered into 56 commercial contracts relating to such matters as the construction, operation and financing of the plant and the acquisition of waste wood that would be burnt to produce energy.

In dismissing the investor’s appeal, the FTT nevertheless found that the LLP had not started trading prior to the sale. It noted that acts involved in setting up a business, such as establishing a decision-making structure, purchasing plant, arranging finance and getting ready to face customers, do not themselves amount to commencing or carrying on a trade.

Prior to the sale the LLP had yet to begin operational activities, in the sense of dealings with third parties immediately and directly related to the supplies to be made by the plant which it was hoped would yield a profit. The contract to acquire waste wood was contingent on the plant’s construction and in any event involved the making of supplies to the LLP, rather than the other way around.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...