Don't Even Think About Doing a Property Deal Without Legal Advice

12th September 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

Property purchases are, for the majority of people, the highest-value deals they ever enter into and that is why they should never be undertaken in haste or without expert legal advice. A case in which an amateurish, home-made agreement led to years of costly strife between family members illustrates the point effectively.

Due to concerns that the opportunity to purchase a property might otherwise be lost, the sale agreement was created in a hurry, without the assistance of a solicitor. It stated that a woman had put £150,000 towards the purchase of the house by her stepson and his wife, that the money was not an interest-free loan and that she would have a share in the property to reflect the value of her contribution.

After a family rift developed, the woman launched proceedings. A judge rejected the couple’s claim that the agreement was a forgery and ruled that she was entitled to a 37.5 per cent stake in the house. He ordered that the property be sold and the woman be paid her share from the net proceeds of the sale. Responsibility for discharging the mortgage on the property fell on the couple alone.

In challenging that outcome, the couple argued that the woman’s claim should have been dismissed in its entirety because she had not come to court with ‘clean hands’. She had confessed during the trial that she had forged her deceased husband’s will, appointing herself as his executor and beneficiary. He had in fact died intestate, with the result that most of the money she had contributed to the house purchase did not belong to her but to the estate.

The High Court acknowledged, in the form of a declaration, that the woman held that part of her stake in the property attributable to her purported inheritance from her husband on trust for his estate. However, in dismissing the couple’s appeal, the Court noted that the stepson held his interest in his father’s estate in a different capacity to his interest in the property.

The woman had also put some of her own money towards the purchase, and the estate, rather than her stepson, was the principal victim of her act of forgery. The agreement accurately stated the amount of her contribution and it was not rendered unenforceable by the fact that not all of that money belonged to her. Neither the judge’s division of the sale proceeds nor his order that the couple pay 70 per cent of the legal costs of the case could be criticised.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Inveterate Trespasser Rightly Jailed for Contempt, Court of Appeal Rules

16th October, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

It is in the nature of litigation that the losing party frequently feels that the judge was wrong and the outcome unjust. However, a case in which a householder repeatedly lost his liberty, and ultimately his home, due to his defiance of court orders shows how important it is to accept judicial decisions and move on. The man claimed to enjoy an unrestricted right of way on foot over part of the garden of an adjoining property owned by a social housing provider. His arguments to that effect were rejected...

LPA – Bank Practice

11th October, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

A lasting power of attorney (LPA) is a document that may be used so that the finances or other issues of a person who cannot deal with them themselves may be attended to by a trusted third party – normally a solicitor or a family member. When an LPA is presented to a bank or other financial institution, it appears to have become normal practice that it must be certified and dated by a solicitor or notary on each page of the document.Source: Concious

Raising Cash on the Security of Your Home? Always See a Lawyer First

8th October, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

Many vulnerable people who fall into debt are tempted to raise cash on the security of their homes. However, a case in which an elderly couple came within an ace of losing the roof over their heads stands as a warning to all that such arrangements should never be entered into without first taking professional advice. In response to a newspaper advertisement, the couple, who were in dire financial straits, contacted a company that promised to put them back in the black. After they were persuaded to sign a blank...

Where, If Anywhere, Do the Jet Set Call Home? High Court Gives Guidance

4th October, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

Very rich people often live jet set lifestyles of ceaseless travel, so pinning down the country in which they are domiciled can be a serious challenge. The High Court faced exactly that difficulty in a case concerning the acrimonious breakdown of a relationship between a wealthy divorcee and her boyfriend. The divorcee, who was a woman of immense means, for a number of years enjoyed a lavish and peripatetic lifestyle with her boyfriend, whom she had met at the gym where he worked. After they separated, she launched proceedings against...