Don't Delay Making a Will Until You Feel the Hand of Mortality Upon You

19th August 2021 By

Far too many people put off making a will until ill health strikes and reminds them of their mortality. In a striking case on point, the High Court ruled that a will signed by a prosperous farmer when he was in his 80s and suffering from dementia was not worth the paper it was written on.

For many years prior to his death, the farmer made it plain to members of his family that he intended to leave all of his farmland to one of his sons – the farming son – and a share in a family construction business to the other – the businessman son. He made two wills reflecting that intention.

Following the untimely death of the farming son, however, he executed a final will by which he bequeathed 58 acres of farmland to the businessman son. He died, aged 84, not much more than a year after signing that document. The validity of the will was challenged by, amongst others, the farming son’s widow.

Ruling on the case, the Court noted that the will was executed in the presence of a solicitor and a doctor. Each of its clauses was read over to the farmer before he nodded to indicate his assent and signed the document. The Court rejected claims that the businessman son had exerted undue influence over him.

In declaring the will invalid, however, the Court noted that the farmer was at the time suffering from moderately severe dementia and his condition had been deteriorating from week to week. The evidence cast doubt on the extent of his understanding and it was likely he lacked the mental capacity required to make a valid will.

The Court noted that, in reliance on his expected inheritance and in fulfilment of his father’s wishes, the farming son had toiled long hours on the family farm, around which he had built his life. Even had the will been valid, the Court concluded that fairness would have demanded the 58 acres pass to the farming son’s estate.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...