fbpx

Disturbed by Your Neighbours' Building Plans? See a Solicitor Today

9th March 2021 By

If you feel that your neighbours’ building plans will impact on your views or otherwise harm your enjoyment of your home, you should not hesitate to consult a solicitor. In one case, a couple who did just that succeeded in blocking construction of a strikingly modern house on land adjoining their garden.

The couple’s neighbours had obtained planning permission for the new house in the garden of their existing home. However, the title deeds of their property contained a restrictive covenant dating back to 1874. It dictated, amongst other things, that only one house could be built on their land. They applied to the Upper Tribunal (UT) to modify or discharge the covenant so that they could proceed with their project. The application was, however, resisted by the couple whose garden adjoined the proposed development site.

The neighbours said that the house had been designed by an architect to meet the needs of one of them who was in poor health. Built into a slope with a low-pitched roof, it would have a minimal visual impact on the existing neighbourhood. They pointed out that construction of modern homes in more traditional areas was becoming more prevalent.

The couple, however, said that it would overlook their garden, making it feel more enclosed, and impinge on their panoramic countryside views. Their peace would be considerably disturbed by the building works and by increased traffic movements thereafter. Having bought their home only recently, they had been reassured by the protection afforded by the covenant.

Dismissing the neighbours’ application, the UT rejected arguments that the covenant was obsolete. Despite its antiquity, the thrust of the restrictions it imposed were still very much alive in the 21st century. It continued to secure practical benefits that were of substantial value to the couple. The ruling meant that the neighbours’ building plans could not proceed.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...