fbpx

Disinherited Widow Can Pursue Reasonable Provision Claim Despite Delay

4th February 2022 By

If someone on whom you depend financially dies without reasonably providing for you in their will, you should contact a solicitor straight away. In a High Court case on point, a delay in seeking legal advice very nearly stymied a disinherited widow’s claim against her husband’s estate.

The widow was 26 years younger than her husband and his family disapproved of their union from the outset. The marriage was a troubled one and, either side of a period of at least partial reconciliation, he twice petitioned to divorce her. They finally separated when she moved out of his home about six months prior to his death, aged 67, from an alcohol-related illness.

The will was signed during a downturn in their relationship and was accompanied by a letter of wishes in which he confirmed his intention to make no provision for his widow and to bequeath the entirety of his estate – which was worth £300-350,000 – to his adult children from a previous marriage.

The widow’s response was to issue an application under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, seeking reasonable provision from his estate. She said that she was on a low income and financially dependent on him. She contended that she had cared for him and his elderly mother and paid some of his debts, and that he regularly promised her that she would inherit his house.

The children disputed her claim and argued, amongst other things, that the house was not matrimonial property, having been in their family for over 50 years. At a preliminary hearing, they also pointed out that the Act requires that applications must be lodged no more than six months after a grant of probate. The widow had missed that deadline by about five months.

Ruling on the timing issue, the Court noted that the widow’s claim to outright ownership of the house appeared over-ambitious. The marriage had, however, subsisted for seven years and, had it ended in divorce, she would probably have been entitled to modest financial relief. She had a substantial case that it was unreasonable of her husband to entirely disinherit her. The Court extended the six-month time limit, thereby enabling her to proceed with her claim to a full trial.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Challenge to Will's Validity Rejected by High Court

12th April, 2024 By

The best way to ensure your assets will be distributed as you wish is to have your will professionally drafted by a qualified solicitor. In a recent case, a challenge to the validity of an elderly man's will was dismissed by the High Court. The man had previously made a will in 2011, leaving most of his estate equally to his three children. In 2018, by which time one of his sons had predeceased him, he made a further will, leaving the residue of his estate to his other son...

Defiance of Family Court Orders Will Always End Badly

10th April, 2024 By

Custodial sentences very rarely come into play in the family courts. Where there have been repeated breaches of court orders, however, judges may have little choice but to clamp down. This was illustrated in the High Court during committal proceedings that stemmed from a child custody dispute. The background to the case involved contested proceedings between the father and mother of a young child. These concluded with a court order establishing that the child – a daughter – would live with the mother. Three months later the daughter travelled with...

Claim for SDLT Relief on Annex Unsuccessful

8th April, 2024 By

When buying a property consisting of more than one residence, it may be possible to claim multiple dwellings relief (MDR) against Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT). However, there are certain conditions that must be met for an MDR claim to succeed, as a recent case illustrates. A property was purchased for £1.8 million. Prior to the purchase, the buyer had agreed with the seller that he would be allowed to carry out works to construct a self-contained annex at the property. The buyer's SDLT return included a claim for MDR...

Divorce – Alleged Bigamy Raised in Financial Remedies Dispute

5th April, 2024 By

The issue of bigamy and its potential impact on a person's ability to seek financial remedies in a divorce came under the legal spotlight recently. A husband made an application to strike out his wife's financial remedies claim on the basis that she had committed bigamy and deceived him into a marriage when she knew she was not free to marry. This deceit, he claimed, was so egregious that, as a matter of public policy, she should be debarred from pursuing any claim for financial remedies against him. The husband based...