Disinherited Daughter's Bid for a Share of Her Father's Estate Rejected

3rd July 2020 By

If someone upon whom you depend financially dies leaving you nothing in his or her will, judges have the power to ensure that you do not go empty-handed. As a High Court case showed, however, that power will only be exercised in your favour if your need for support is both pressing and genuine.

The case concerned a delivery driver whose modest lifestyle had been boosted by a £450,000 lottery win some years before his death from a brain tumour. By his will, he left his entire estate – valued at £268,000 – to his second wife. His half share of the marital home represented about 80 per cent of that sum.

Following his death, his daughter by his first marriage launched proceedings under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 seeking reasonable provision from his estate. A married mother of two, she argued that she and her family were in need of financial support in that they were saddled with substantial debts and were living in a house that was too small for them.

Rejecting her claim as hopeless, however, the Court noted that she appeared to be labouring under the mistaken assumption that she was entitled to a share of her father’s estate come what may. She and her husband had enjoyed several luxury holidays and were living comfortably. Their combined income was more than sufficient to meet their day-to-day needs and her bank and credit card debts were self-inflicted.

Her father’s widow, by contrast, was wheelchair dependent due to ever-worsening motor neurone disease and required every penny of her inheritance to maintain her independence and live out her remaining years in dignity and comfort. Her savings were modest and any award in the daughter’s favour would require her to sell or mortgage the home where she was looked after by a live-in carer.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Challenge to Will's Validity Rejected by High Court

12th April, 2024 By

The best way to ensure your assets will be distributed as you wish is to have your will professionally drafted by a qualified solicitor. In a recent case, a challenge to the validity of an elderly man's will was dismissed by the High Court. The man had previously made a will in 2011, leaving most of his estate equally to his three children. In 2018, by which time one of his sons had predeceased him, he made a further will, leaving the residue of his estate to his other son...

Defiance of Family Court Orders Will Always End Badly

10th April, 2024 By

Custodial sentences very rarely come into play in the family courts. Where there have been repeated breaches of court orders, however, judges may have little choice but to clamp down. This was illustrated in the High Court during committal proceedings that stemmed from a child custody dispute. The background to the case involved contested proceedings between the father and mother of a young child. These concluded with a court order establishing that the child – a daughter – would live with the mother. Three months later the daughter travelled with...

Claim for SDLT Relief on Annex Unsuccessful

8th April, 2024 By

When buying a property consisting of more than one residence, it may be possible to claim multiple dwellings relief (MDR) against Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT). However, there are certain conditions that must be met for an MDR claim to succeed, as a recent case illustrates. A property was purchased for £1.8 million. Prior to the purchase, the buyer had agreed with the seller that he would be allowed to carry out works to construct a self-contained annex at the property. The buyer's SDLT return included a claim for MDR...

Divorce – Alleged Bigamy Raised in Financial Remedies Dispute

5th April, 2024 By

The issue of bigamy and its potential impact on a person's ability to seek financial remedies in a divorce came under the legal spotlight recently. A husband made an application to strike out his wife's financial remedies claim on the basis that she had committed bigamy and deceived him into a marriage when she knew she was not free to marry. This deceit, he claimed, was so egregious that, as a matter of public policy, she should be debarred from pursuing any claim for financial remedies against him. The husband based...