fbpx

Disappointed Children Fail to Overturn Will

3rd August 2018 By Arman Khosravi

When a will is made late in life which materially changes how an estate is to be distributed (especially when the new will favours one of a number of children), a dispute following the death is almost inevitable.

So it was when an 85-year-old woman made a new will which left her house to the youngest of her three children. The value of the house was approximately £350,000. It was effectively the only asset in her estate and an earlier will (made when she was 80) had divided her estate equally among her three children.

The second will was of the ‘pre-printed’ type and its validity was attacked by the siblings disadvantaged by it. They argued that it was not properly executed, that their mother lacked testamentary capacity, that she did not ‘know and approve’ the contents of the will (meaning she did not appreciate that the outcome would be an unequal division of her estate) and that it was procured as a result of undue influence on the part of her youngest child, with whom she had spent a considerable amount of time in the years leading up to her death.

The validity of the execution of the will was for the youngest child to prove. The witnesses to the will were able to confirm the circumstances under which it was signed. In addition, they confirmed that the woman had told them its main provision – that the youngest child would receive the house.

The evidence put before the court by witnesses who knew the woman led to the rejection of the claims regarding her lack of mental capacity and that she did not have knowledge and approval of the contents of the will. The final claim, that the youngest son had used undue influence to procure the creation of the new will, was also unsupported by the evidence. The fact that the other two children owned houses, whereas the youngest did not, was a key point in understanding her motivation.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...