fbpx

Delay Denies Financial Support for Divorcee

19th December 2016 By

It is not uncommon for affection and trust to survive the end of a marriage – but legal advice is still almost always required to ensure a fair outcome. In one striking case, a woman who waited until almost 20 years had passed since her divorce before seeking financial support from her ex-husband ended up with nothing but a family judge’s sympathy.

The woman was aged 17 when she married a man who was almost a decade her senior. Their 13-year marriage ended in divorce in 1995, but she continued to trust him and did not launch financial relief proceedings against him until 2014. Although his infidelity had contributed to the breakdown of the marriage, she had throughout remained convinced that he would ‘see her right’.

In ordering her ex-husband to pay her a £10,000 lump sum and annual maintenance of £9,576 for life, a district judge found that he had culpably strung her along and lulled her into a false sense of security. She had fallen on straitened financial circumstances and had a clear need for financial support.

In allowing the ex-husband’s appeal against that decision, however, a family judge noted that a great deal of water had passed under the bridge since the divorce and that a 20-year delay in launching proceedings might well be unprecedented. Misfortunes that the woman had endured during those years had not been caused by her divorce and there was no basis for an award designed to make good the shortfall in her budget indefinitely.

The district judge’s sympathy for the woman’s predicament was understandable, as was the dim view she took of the ex-husband’s behaviour. However, in the absence of a causal link between the marriage and the woman’s current need, there was no basis for making the awards, both of which were overturned.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...