Defamation – Anonymous Bloggers Are Not Beyond the Reach of the Law

27th July 2022 By

Vindictive bloggers who hide behind a cloak of anonymity may feel that they can use the internet to subject innocent people to abuse with complete impunity. However, in coming to the aid of an academic falsely accused of being a sexual predator, the High Court emphatically showed how very wrong they are.

The academic was the target of an anonymous online campaign accusing him of sexual misconduct of the most serious kind. A nameless blogger had cynically used the #MeToo debate as part of their strategy. The impact on the academic was grave indeed: he was excluded from academic events, all but destroying his career and livelihood, and was so tormented that he could barely sleep. The link to #MeToo meant that institutions and individuals were pressured to immediately cut ties with him or be branded enablers of sexual misbehaviour.

After the academic launched libel proceedings, the blogger neither revealed their identity nor took any part in the proceedings. A default judgment was therefore entered against them. Following a hearing, the Court noted the relentless nature of the campaign and ordered the blogger to pay the academic £70,000 in damages. The award was designed to vindicate the latter’s good name and to reflect and signal the total falsity of the allegations against him.

The Court issued an injunction against the blogger, forbidding further publication of the same or similar defamatory allegations. Disobedience of that order would be a contempt of court, punishable by up to two years’ imprisonment. The order was served via an email address to which the blogger was known to have access. Google was also ordered to remove the dedicated website the blogger had used as a vehicle for the campaign.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Self-Builders Achieve Landmark Victory in Capital Gains Tax Appeal

17th August, 2022 By

In a ruling which will be greeted with joy by the growing community of self-builders, a couple who made a very handsome return on their 'Grand Designs'-style project have been relieved of a six-figure Capital Gains Tax (CGT) bill. The couple bought a plot of land for £1,679,000 before demolishing the house that stood on it and replacing it with a new residence. The project lasted for the best part of three years and, following completion, the couple lived in their new home for about 14 months before they sold...

Make a Lasting Power of Attorney While You Still Have the Capacity to Do So

12th August, 2022 By

Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) enable thousands of vulnerable people to have their financial and other affairs managed by others whom they trust. However, as a High Court case showed, it is vital to remember that they can only be granted by those who retain the mental capacity to make their own rational choices. The case concerned a 60-year-old man who had a lifelong learning disability and a diagnosis of chronic schizophrenia. In 2009, he purported to grant an LPA in favour of his two brothers and his mother. Some...

Intransigence in Divorce Proceedings Can Come at a Crushing Price

9th August, 2022 By

In divorce proceedings, those who make overly ambitious financial claims or fail to enter into reasonable negotiations are highly likely to end up worse off. The point was powerfully made by a case in which a bitterly opposed former couple ran up more than £1.2 million in legal costs bills. Following a hearing, a family judge directed the husband to pay the wife a lump sum of £750,000. That was only a fraction of the more than £6 million she had initially claimed. £237,000 of the award was to clear...

Non-UK Residency – Tribunal Relieves Taxpayer of £3 Million Tax Demand

4th August, 2022 By

Claims to non-UK residency for tax purposes are a political and fiscal hot potato and HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) are, to say the least, reluctant to accept them. In an exceptional case, however, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) backed a hard-pressed taxpayer and relieved her of a seven-figure tax demand. The woman relocated from the UK to Ireland before receiving a dividend on shares of about £8 million. HMRC refused to accept that she was a non-UK resident during the relevant tax year and amended her self-assessment tax return so...