COVID-19 – Troubled Mother Permitted Skin-to-Skin Contact with Her Baby

2nd February 2021 By

Contact arrangements between children in care and their parents often raise vexed issues, but all the more so during the COVID-19 pandemic. In a case concerning a mother who was denied skin-to-skin contact with her newborn baby, however, the High Court bent every sinew to achieve a just and practical resolution.

The mother suffered from an emotionally unstable personality disorder and accepted that she was not currently able to care for her daughter, who was born at the height of the pandemic. The child was made the subject of an emergency protection order when she was two days old and an interim care order was made soon afterwards. The mother launched proceedings against a health and social services trust after she was denied skin-to-skin contact with her baby.

At the Court’s prompting, the Department of Health’s Chief Medical Officer, Dr Michael McBride, made a rare but decisive intervention in the case. He advised that, in his professional view, a denial of skin-to-skin contact between mother and daughter was unnecessary and disproportionate.

Emphasising the importance of maternal bonding, he said that an absence of such contact could have long-term adverse consequences for both mother and child. With the benefit of that advice, a resolution was arrived at whereby the trust agreed to permit skin-to-skin contact with appropriate safety precautions in place to guard against transmission of COVID-19.

The mother pursued her claim for a declaration that the denial of skin-to-skin contact between her and her baby amounted to a breach of her human right to respect for her family life. In ruling that such a declaration would serve no useful purpose, however, the Court noted that the pandemic had caused unavoidable disruption to many families and found that the trust had acted proportionately when faced with a very difficult situation. The Court thanked Dr McBride for his constructive advice, which had led to a mutually beneficial resolution of the matter.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Creating a Family Trust? Are You Sure It Reflects Your True Intentions?

20th April, 2021 By

Rather than giving money to your children directly, you may choose for a variety of good reasons to provide for them by way of a discretionary trust. Such a step is a serious matter, however, and as a High Court case underlined, it is extremely difficult to alter a trust deed after it has been formally executed. The case concerned a father who wished to make provision for his three children from an inheritance of about £450,000 that he had received from his mother. He signed a deed that varied...

Sensible Divorcees Put Personal Animosity Aside – Court of Appeal Ruling

15th April, 2021 By

Any good lawyer will tell you that it is far better for divorcing couples to agree how their assets should be divided, rather than fighting it out in court. A Court of Appeal case showed, however, that, where personal animosity persists, it is only too easy for the terms of such agreements to themselves become the subject of dispute. The case concerned a very wealthy couple who, following highly acrimonious divorce proceedings, resolved to settle their differences. They signed a consent order which it was hoped would lead to a...

COVID-19 – High Court Authorises Vaccination of Elderly Dementia Sufferer

12th April, 2021 By

Should vulnerable people who lack the mental capacity to make important decisions for themselves be vaccinated against COVID-19 even in the face of objections from their loved ones? The High Court confronted that uniquely difficult issue in the case of an 80-year-old care home resident who was suffering from dementia. The woman's son did not object to vaccination in principle but was deeply sceptical about the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines and the speed at which they had been authorised for use. In opposing her vaccination, he argued that her wishes...

In Dispute with Your Neighbour? A Lawyer Will Help to Restore Peace

9th April, 2021 By

Disputes between neighbours frequently inflict enormous emotional and financial harm on all involved. A High Court dispute concerning use of a shared driveway showed why any lawyer would advise sensible negotiation as a far better alternative to litigation. A couple's right of way over the driveway, by which they accessed their rural home, was restricted to passage on foot or by private motor vehicles. Their neighbour, with whom they shared the driveway, launched proceedings against them alleging that they were in long-standing breach of that restriction by permitting its use...