COVID-19 – Ruling Underlines Desperate Impact on Care Home Residents

15th February 2021 By

Amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, it is becoming increasingly hard to see where the balance of harm lies between the risk of exposing care home residents to a life-threatening virus and compromising their most basic quality of life. The Court of Protection made that point in coming to the aid of a man whose contact with his beloved wife was restricted to conversations through a barely ajar window.

The 58-year-old woman’s relationship with her husband had endured for 40 years. A music lover who was extremely well travelled, she enjoyed life to the full, contributed to her community and had many friends. After suffering a brain haemorrhage followed by a stroke, however, she was confined to a rehabilitation unit when lockdown was announced. She had subsequently been moved to a care home.

Deeply anxious about the impact of isolation on her mental health, her husband was gladiatorial on her behalf in seeking to maximise contact between them. Restrictions in force at the care home, however, meant that he had to brave the winter elements to speak to her through an open window. Contact had been further compromised whilst she was in quarantine on first arriving at the home and after she contracted the virus, from which she thankfully made a good recovery.

The husband challenged a standard authorisation which had been granted to a local authority and which sanctioned deprivation of his wife’s liberty and her confinement in residential care. Ruling on the matter, the Court noted that the pandemic had led to unparalleled restrictions being placed on personal freedom. The health emergency meant that individual needs sometimes had to be displaced by the even greater need to protect the wider public.

However, the state’s obligation to protect individual rights, particularly those of the vulnerable and mentally incapacitated, was if anything enhanced during the crisis. It was wrong to regard care home residents as a homogenous group and the character, personality and needs of each individual had to be considered.

Noting promising news concerning the likely effectiveness and availability of COVID-19 vaccines, the Court expressed the view that care homes should place themselves in the vanguard of exploiting any opportunity to promote contact between residents and their loved ones. Given that, for many in the care system, time is simply not on their side, the Court urged care homes not to lag behind and to take their position on the front line.

The Court authorised investigations to be conducted that would produce a clearer picture of the contact options open to the man and his wife. The results of those investigations would be considered at a further hearing. In the interim, the Court urged the care home’s management – who had exhibited a cooperative spirit throughout – to facilitate window contact between the couple on a daily basis.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Tax Tribunal Rules Peripatetic Businessman 'Ordinarily Resident' in the UK

26th February, 2021 By

Many businesspeople lead peripatetic lives of constant international travel and the crucial question of whether they are settled in the UK for tax purposes can be very difficult to answer. A First-tier Tribunal (FTT) ruling, however, revealed the lengths to which HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) will go to establish that a taxpayer is ordinarily resident in this country. The case concerned the tax treatment of £578,400 received by an overseas national on the severance of an employment contract. He claimed that, by virtue of Section 414 of the Income...

High Court Uncovers Blatant Forgery as Will Dispute Tears Family Apart

24th February, 2021 By

If an elderly man had listened to his solicitor's repeated advice to make a will, his children would have avoided a sea of trouble after his death. His failure to do so resulted in a bitter High Court dispute and a judge's finding that one of his daughters resorted to forgery in a bid to inherit almost everything he owned. Following his death, his daughter claimed to have discovered a photocopy of his will. The home-made document – the original of which was never found – purported to bequeath to...

Renting Out Your Home on AirBnB Without Legal Advice is a Grave Mistake

23rd February, 2021 By

Many tenants who forego legal advice before subletting their homes to tourists and other short-term visitors do so in blissful ignorance that they may well be breaching the terms of their leases. That was certainly so in the case of a flat dweller whose use of AirBnB placed the roof over his head in jeopardy. After receiving complaints from the man's neighbours, his landlord took action before the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) and obtained a declaration under the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 that he had breached covenants in his...

Given a Raw Deal by a Divorce Judge? Don't Just Sit on Your Hands

18th February, 2021 By

Many divorcees feel that judges have given them a raw deal when dividing up marital assets. They may or may not be right about that but, as one case strikingly showed, it makes much better sense for them to seek swift professional advice than to sit on their hands dwelling on what might have been. The case concerned a middle-aged couple whose relationship lasted for almost 15 years and resulted in two children prior to their divorce. Their assets comprised over £400,000 yielded from the sale of their former matrimonial...