fbpx

Court of Appeal Acts to Save Entrenched Litigants From Themselves

1st November 2019 By Arman Khosravi

The whole purpose of the civil justice system is to achieve just and final resolution of frequently intractable disputes – and, as a guideline Court of Appeal decision in an inheritance case made plain, that includes saving litigants from themselves by encouraging them to settle their differences.

The case concerned a widow’s claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 for reasonable financial provision from her husband’s estate. The executor of the estate resisted her claim and opposed a judge’s suggestion that a procedure be adopted whereby the opposing arguments would be submitted to an early neutral evaluation (ENE). Given the executor’s refusal of consent to that course being taken, the judge took the view that she had no power to order an ENE hearing.

In upholding the widow’s appeal against that decision, the Court noted that in many cases – particularly financial relief proceedings in divorce, inheritance disputes and boundary rows between neighbours – the parties are resistant, or even hostile, to any suggestion that their dispute might be resolved by agreement. In such cases, the ENE procedure has a proven track record as an invaluable means of focusing minds on the possibility of settlement.

The Court found that, on a true interpretation of the relevant procedure rule, the judge was not required to obtain the consent of either party before ordering an ENE hearing. Directing that such a hearing take place as soon as possible, the Court noted that it would not involve any material obstruction of or constraint on the executor’s access to justice and had the potential to save substantial legal costs.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...