fbpx

Court Accepts £6 Million Distribution to Attorney

15th November 2018 By Arman Khosravi

When a person’s affairs are being managed by someone else under a lasting power of attorney (LPA), there are strict rules about what the attorney can and cannot do with the assets placed under their control. The attorney is expected to safeguard the assets of the person who gave them the LPA and their own withdrawals should only be for what is reasonable and necessary.

However, that does not mean they are completely restricted as to what they can do. If they can show that the person they are acting for would want them to make gifts or take an action that benefits them or others, then doing so may be possible, as a recent case demonstrates.

It involved an attorney who is the son of a very wealthy woman who has advanced dementia and has lived in a care home for several years. With her death expected to be some years away, the current liability to Inheritance Tax (IHT) were she to die would be more than £6 million. Her assets are very considerably in excess of any reasonable expectation of her financial needs for the rest of her life. Her son, the attorney, stands under her will to inherit some £17 million before IHT, after specific bequests of about £1 million.

The attorney and the other beneficiaries under the woman’s will reached a negotiated position whereby £6 million of her estate would be given to him. The reason for so doing is that the IHT burden is likely to be reduced (by up to £2.6 million) if the woman survives until 2025.

The arrangement had to be approved by the Court of Protection, which, having heard evidence concerning the woman’s desire to reduce taxes and to make gifts out of her assets, agreed that it would be in her best interests to allow the scheme to go ahead.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Challenge to Will's Validity Rejected by High Court

12th April, 2024 By

The best way to ensure your assets will be distributed as you wish is to have your will professionally drafted by a qualified solicitor. In a recent case, a challenge to the validity of an elderly man's will was dismissed by the High Court. The man had previously made a will in 2011, leaving most of his estate equally to his three children. In 2018, by which time one of his sons had predeceased him, he made a further will, leaving the residue of his estate to his other son...

Defiance of Family Court Orders Will Always End Badly

10th April, 2024 By

Custodial sentences very rarely come into play in the family courts. Where there have been repeated breaches of court orders, however, judges may have little choice but to clamp down. This was illustrated in the High Court during committal proceedings that stemmed from a child custody dispute. The background to the case involved contested proceedings between the father and mother of a young child. These concluded with a court order establishing that the child – a daughter – would live with the mother. Three months later the daughter travelled with...

Claim for SDLT Relief on Annex Unsuccessful

8th April, 2024 By

When buying a property consisting of more than one residence, it may be possible to claim multiple dwellings relief (MDR) against Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT). However, there are certain conditions that must be met for an MDR claim to succeed, as a recent case illustrates. A property was purchased for £1.8 million. Prior to the purchase, the buyer had agreed with the seller that he would be allowed to carry out works to construct a self-contained annex at the property. The buyer's SDLT return included a claim for MDR...

Divorce – Alleged Bigamy Raised in Financial Remedies Dispute

5th April, 2024 By

The issue of bigamy and its potential impact on a person's ability to seek financial remedies in a divorce came under the legal spotlight recently. A husband made an application to strike out his wife's financial remedies claim on the basis that she had committed bigamy and deceived him into a marriage when she knew she was not free to marry. This deceit, he claimed, was so egregious that, as a matter of public policy, she should be debarred from pursuing any claim for financial remedies against him. The husband based...