fbpx

Claim for SDLT Relief on Annex Unsuccessful

8th April 2024 By

When buying a property consisting of more than one residence, it may be possible to claim multiple dwellings relief (MDR) against Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT). However, there are certain conditions that must be met for an MDR claim to succeed, as a recent case illustrates.

A property was purchased for £1.8 million. Prior to the purchase, the buyer had agreed with the seller that he would be allowed to carry out works to construct a self-contained annex at the property. The buyer’s SDLT return included a claim for MDR and indicated that the amount of SDLT due was £40,000. However, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) concluded that MDR was not available and the correct amount of SDLT was therefore £114,750. After the buyer’s statutory review appeal against that decision was unsuccessful, he appealed to the First-tier Tribunal (FTT).

Under Paragraph 7(2) of Schedule 6B of the Finance Act 2003, a building or part of a building counts as a dwelling if it is ‘used or suitable for use as a single dwelling’, or if it is in the process of being constructed or adapted for such use. The buyer argued that the annex, as currently configured, had all of the amenities required for independent living and was separate from the main house. HMRC asserted that the annex was not sufficiently independent of the main house, and that the work carried out by the time the sale was completed was insufficient to demonstrate that a single dwelling was in the process of being constructed.

Dismissing the appeal, the FTT concluded that the annex lacked several features needed to consider it a single dwelling. There was no evidence that it had its own postal address or Council Tax billing, or that the internal door between it and the main property was lockable on both sides. The annex did not have separate water or electricity meters. In addition, the buyer had not proven that planning permission for the work had been obtained, or alternatively that it was not needed. The FTT also noted that no tenants had occupied the annex in the two years after the work was completed.

The FTT further ruled that the work done by the date of completion was insufficient to show that the annex was in the process of being adapted for use as a single dwelling.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...