fbpx

Caring Restaurateur Relieved of £60,000 Tax Return Late Filing Penalties

10th February 2021 By

Those who deliberately delay filing their tax returns risk incurring severe financial penalties. However, the tax regime leaves room for mercy and, in relieving a hard-pressed restaurateur of more than £60,000 in penalties, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) took account of her caring responsibilities for a succession of sick and elderly relatives.

The woman managed an extensive family restaurant business. She explained her delay in filing her returns in respect of two tax years by the fact that she was at the relevant time primary carer for her father and parents-in-law, all of whom had since died. She also said that, whilst running the business hands on, she left financial matters in the hands of her husband and their accountant.

In dismissing her appeal against automatic and late-filing penalties amounting to £15,700, the FTT noted that she bore personal responsibility for filing the returns on time. Her reliance on others to deal with her financial affairs did not amount to a reasonable excuse for her failure to do so.

However, in upholding her challenge to further penalties totalling £60,243, the FTT found that HM Revenue and Customs had failed to show that the filing delays were deliberate. When under pressure due to her caring and business responsibilities, it was unsurprising that she left tax compliance matters to others. She gave penalty letters to her husband to deal with and was angry when she discovered that filing deadlines had been missed.

Source: Concious

Latest News

High Court Grants Parental Order Despite Previous Adoption

18th April, 2024 By

In law, adopted children are regarded as having been born to their adoptive parents. The Family Division of the High Court recently considered whether that fact precluded a parental order being granted under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (HFEA) in respect of a child born via surrogacy. A couple who lived in the USA had entered into a surrogacy arrangement with another woman. An adoption order naming the couple as the child's parents had been made by a US court and was automatically recognised under UK law. However,...

Flat Owner Not Liable for Pre-existing Structural Issues

16th April, 2024 By

When building owners carry out works on their property, are they liable for damage to adjoining properties that results from pre-existing structural issues? The Court of Appeal recently provided welcome clarification on that question. The owner of a ground-floor flat wished to extend it by building out into his garden. He served notices on owners of adjoining properties, as required by the Party Wall etc. Act 1996. The works caused the rear wall of two adjoining properties to drop by about 2 mm, which led to internal walls and floor...

Challenge to Will's Validity Rejected by High Court

12th April, 2024 By

The best way to ensure your assets will be distributed as you wish is to have your will professionally drafted by a qualified solicitor. In a recent case, a challenge to the validity of an elderly man's will was dismissed by the High Court. The man had previously made a will in 2011, leaving most of his estate equally to his three children. In 2018, by which time one of his sons had predeceased him, he made a further will, leaving the residue of his estate to his other son...

Defiance of Family Court Orders Will Always End Badly

10th April, 2024 By

Custodial sentences very rarely come into play in the family courts. Where there have been repeated breaches of court orders, however, judges may have little choice but to clamp down. This was illustrated in the High Court during committal proceedings that stemmed from a child custody dispute. The background to the case involved contested proceedings between the father and mother of a young child. These concluded with a court order establishing that the child – a daughter – would live with the mother. Three months later the daughter travelled with...