Business Tycoon's Wife Well Served by Lawyers Who Drafted Her Will

2nd January 2018 By Arman Khosravi

A solicitor’s primary duty when drafting a will is to follow faithfully their client’s instructions after giving accurate and level-headed advice. In a professional negligence case triggered by the early death of a business tycoon’s wife, the High Court ruled that that is exactly what a law firm did. The case does, however, make the point strongly that wills should always be kept under review to ensure they are still appropriate if circumstances change.

The woman was ten years younger than her husband and, until she was diagnosed with cancer, had confidently expected to survive him. Their assets included two homes, together valued at more than £6 million. They owned the properties as joint tenants and, when she died before him, he became sole owner of both of them by survivorship.

Suffering from dementia, he had moved into a nursing home some years before his wife’s death and lacked the mental capacity to change his will. The final will that he was able to make, executed 14 years before she died, bequeathed the residue of his estate to a charity with whom the couple had subsequently fallen out. The end result was that the charity stood to inherit both properties on his death.

In those circumstances, the executors of the woman’s estate launched proceedings against the firm that had drafted her will. It was argued that the firm should have advised her to sever the joint tenancies in respect of both properties, so that she and her husband owned them as ‘tenants in common’. That would have resulted in her half share in both of them forming part of her estate and passing to her chosen beneficiaries – which did not include the charity – rather than to her husband.

In rejecting the executors’ claim, however, the Court found that the firm had taken all due care to ensure that effect was given to her intentions. She had been carefully advised on the pros and cons of severing the tenancies and had expressed her unwillingness to do so. It was in part her continued devotion to her sick husband that had caused her to put off the issue and refrain from taking that course.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Challenge to Will's Validity Rejected by High Court

12th April, 2024 By

The best way to ensure your assets will be distributed as you wish is to have your will professionally drafted by a qualified solicitor. In a recent case, a challenge to the validity of an elderly man's will was dismissed by the High Court. The man had previously made a will in 2011, leaving most of his estate equally to his three children. In 2018, by which time one of his sons had predeceased him, he made a further will, leaving the residue of his estate to his other son...

Defiance of Family Court Orders Will Always End Badly

10th April, 2024 By

Custodial sentences very rarely come into play in the family courts. Where there have been repeated breaches of court orders, however, judges may have little choice but to clamp down. This was illustrated in the High Court during committal proceedings that stemmed from a child custody dispute. The background to the case involved contested proceedings between the father and mother of a young child. These concluded with a court order establishing that the child – a daughter – would live with the mother. Three months later the daughter travelled with...

Claim for SDLT Relief on Annex Unsuccessful

8th April, 2024 By

When buying a property consisting of more than one residence, it may be possible to claim multiple dwellings relief (MDR) against Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT). However, there are certain conditions that must be met for an MDR claim to succeed, as a recent case illustrates. A property was purchased for £1.8 million. Prior to the purchase, the buyer had agreed with the seller that he would be allowed to carry out works to construct a self-contained annex at the property. The buyer's SDLT return included a claim for MDR...

Divorce – Alleged Bigamy Raised in Financial Remedies Dispute

5th April, 2024 By

The issue of bigamy and its potential impact on a person's ability to seek financial remedies in a divorce came under the legal spotlight recently. A husband made an application to strike out his wife's financial remedies claim on the basis that she had committed bigamy and deceived him into a marriage when she knew she was not free to marry. This deceit, he claimed, was so egregious that, as a matter of public policy, she should be debarred from pursuing any claim for financial remedies against him. The husband based...