fbpx

British Child's Inheritance of Italian Property Creates Legal Quandary

10th May 2021 By

Where a British child inherits foreign property, tricky legal issues can arise. However, as one case showed, English judges are well able to deal with such difficulties by applying the overriding principle that the child’s welfare is always paramount.

The case involved an 11-year-old boy whose father died without making a will. Under Italian law, he automatically inherited a 25 per cent share in an Italian holiday home owned by his parents. His mother, who held 75 per cent of the property, wished to sell it at a good price which would yield a capital sum of 55,000 euros for her son.

Standing in the way of that objective, however, were provisions of the Italian Civil Code that require heirs to formally accept an inheritance. Procedural steps had to be strictly followed due to the boy’s age and jurisdictional issues also arose because he was ordinarily resident in England. With a view to overcoming those difficulties, the mother applied to the High Court for an order under the Children Act 1989 authorising her to accept her son’s inheritance on his behalf.

Upholding her application, the Court found that its jurisdiction in matters concerning parental responsibility extended to granting her the authority sought. It was plainly conducive to the child’s welfare for issues concerning his heirship in Italy to be resolved to his financial benefit.

The mother had fully and faithfully discharged her parental responsibility to her son and the relief she sought would bring him no disadvantage. The order would not render him liable for any debts and would enable him to inherit property to which he was entitled. The alternative would be to expose him to the obvious risks entailed in leaving his Italian heirship hanging. The Court noted that the mother would have to seek further judicial authority before the sale of the property could proceed.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Court Sanctions Leg Amputation for Man Lacking Mental Capacity

24th April, 2024 By

The courts are often called upon to sanction treatment for patients whose ability to make decisions for themselves is impaired. In a recent case on point, the Court of Protection had to decide whether it was in the best interests of a man with mental health issues to have his right leg amputated above the knee. The man, aged 60, was taken to hospital by his niece. He was found to have an ulcerated leg. He had a history of paranoid schizophrenia, and believed that the sores on his leg...

High Court Grants Parental Order Despite Previous Adoption

18th April, 2024 By

In law, adopted children are regarded as having been born to their adoptive parents. The Family Division of the High Court recently considered whether that fact precluded a parental order being granted under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (HFEA) in respect of a child born via surrogacy. A couple who lived in the USA had entered into a surrogacy arrangement with another woman. An adoption order naming the couple as the child's parents had been made by a US court and was automatically recognised under UK law. However,...

Flat Owner Not Liable for Pre-existing Structural Issues

16th April, 2024 By

When building owners carry out works on their property, are they liable for damage to adjoining properties that results from pre-existing structural issues? The Court of Appeal recently provided welcome clarification on that question. The owner of a ground-floor flat wished to extend it by building out into his garden. He served notices on owners of adjoining properties, as required by the Party Wall etc. Act 1996. The works caused the rear wall of two adjoining properties to drop by about 2 mm, which led to internal walls and floor...

Challenge to Will's Validity Rejected by High Court

12th April, 2024 By

The best way to ensure your assets will be distributed as you wish is to have your will professionally drafted by a qualified solicitor. In a recent case, a challenge to the validity of an elderly man's will was dismissed by the High Court. The man had previously made a will in 2011, leaving most of his estate equally to his three children. In 2018, by which time one of his sons had predeceased him, he made a further will, leaving the residue of his estate to his other son...