fbpx

Supreme Court Rules in 'Gay Cake' Case

10th October 2018 By Arman Khosravi

In a unanimous judgment, the Supreme Court has ruled that a bakery in Northern Ireland’s refusal to make a cake bearing a slogan in support of same-sex marriage was not discriminatory.

The legal battle began four years ago after Ashers bakery, a family-run business based in County Antrim, refused to make a cake decorated with the Sesame Street characters Bert and Ernie, with the message ‘Support Gay Marriage’, that had been ordered by gay rights activist Gareth Lee.

The branch in Belfast where Mr Lee had placed his order originally accepted the commission, but the company’s head office later contacted him to inform him that his request would not be fulfilled after all. The reason given was that the slogan was inconsistent with the Christian owners’ religious beliefs. Their position was that they would have refused to bake the same cake for any customer, whatever their sexual orientation.

In ruling on the case, the Supreme Court found that Ashers’ decision not to fulfil Mr Lee’s order was because of their objections to the message he had requested. There was therefore no discrimination on the grounds of his sexual orientation.

The president of the Supreme Court, Lady Hale, went on to make clear, "This conclusion is not in any way to diminish the need to protect gay people and people who support gay marriage from discrimination.

It is deeply humiliating, and an affront to human dignity, to deny someone a service because of that person’s race, gender, disability, sexual orientation, religion or belief.

"But that is not what happened in this case."

Source: Concious

Latest News

Company Owner's Negligible Value Claim Unsuccessful

29th April, 2024 By

When an asset falls in value to the point that it is almost worthless, it may be possible to make a negligible value claim under Section 24 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992. The asset will then be treated as if it had been sold and immediately acquired again, so that the loss can be set off against other income. For a claim to succeed, however, the asset must have become of negligible value during the time the claimant owned it. On 30 September 2017, a woman who...

Court Sanctions Leg Amputation for Man Lacking Mental Capacity

24th April, 2024 By

The courts are often called upon to sanction treatment for patients whose ability to make decisions for themselves is impaired. In a recent case on point, the Court of Protection had to decide whether it was in the best interests of a man with mental health issues to have his right leg amputated above the knee. The man, aged 60, was taken to hospital by his niece. He was found to have an ulcerated leg. He had a history of paranoid schizophrenia, and believed that the sores on his leg...

High Court Grants Parental Order Despite Previous Adoption

18th April, 2024 By

In law, adopted children are regarded as having been born to their adoptive parents. The Family Division of the High Court recently considered whether that fact precluded a parental order being granted under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (HFEA) in respect of a child born via surrogacy. A couple who lived in the USA had entered into a surrogacy arrangement with another woman. An adoption order naming the couple as the child's parents had been made by a US court and was automatically recognised under UK law. However,...

Flat Owner Not Liable for Pre-existing Structural Issues

16th April, 2024 By

When building owners carry out works on their property, are they liable for damage to adjoining properties that results from pre-existing structural issues? The Court of Appeal recently provided welcome clarification on that question. The owner of a ground-floor flat wished to extend it by building out into his garden. He served notices on owners of adjoining properties, as required by the Party Wall etc. Act 1996. The works caused the rear wall of two adjoining properties to drop by about 2 mm, which led to internal walls and floor...