fbpx

Parents Who Simply Cannot Cope Don't Deserve Condemnation

8th January 2021 By

Through no fault of their own, some parents are simply incapable of providing the care and stability that all children need whilst growing up. As one case showed, however, the approach of family judges is not to condemn but to seek solutions that enable children to continue living in the bosom of their families.

The case concerned two children, aged four and five, whose mother suffered mental health difficulties, in part due to her own unhappy childhood. Unable to cope, she tended to smack and shout at them. They suffered bumps and bruises because she did not keep a proper eye on them. The state of the family home was very poor and the children were sometimes dirty and not dressed properly.

After social workers intervened, the mother sensibly recognised how bad things had become and accepted that she could not be the children’s primary carer. They went to live with their aunt and uncle, who provided them with a wonderful home. The local authority applied to the Family Court for special guardianship orders which would regularise that arrangement.

In ruling on the matter, the Court’s primary consideration was the children’s welfare. They were entitled to respect for their private and family lives and, although it was obvious that they could not return to live with their mother, their aunt and uncle had transformed their own lives in order to provide them with a stable home, within their natural family, where they were thriving.

Granting the orders sought, the Court noted that the couple had encouraged regular contact between the children and their mother, who undoubtedly loved them and was doing her best to conquer her difficulties. Close contact between them and their older sibling, who was living with another family member, had also been maintained.

The special guardianship orders meant that the children would, throughout their childhood, remain settled with the aunt and uncle, who would have overriding parental responsibility for them.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Court Sanctions Leg Amputation for Man Lacking Mental Capacity

24th April, 2024 By

The courts are often called upon to sanction treatment for patients whose ability to make decisions for themselves is impaired. In a recent case on point, the Court of Protection had to decide whether it was in the best interests of a man with mental health issues to have his right leg amputated above the knee. The man, aged 60, was taken to hospital by his niece. He was found to have an ulcerated leg. He had a history of paranoid schizophrenia, and believed that the sores on his leg...

High Court Grants Parental Order Despite Previous Adoption

18th April, 2024 By

In law, adopted children are regarded as having been born to their adoptive parents. The Family Division of the High Court recently considered whether that fact precluded a parental order being granted under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (HFEA) in respect of a child born via surrogacy. A couple who lived in the USA had entered into a surrogacy arrangement with another woman. An adoption order naming the couple as the child's parents had been made by a US court and was automatically recognised under UK law. However,...

Flat Owner Not Liable for Pre-existing Structural Issues

16th April, 2024 By

When building owners carry out works on their property, are they liable for damage to adjoining properties that results from pre-existing structural issues? The Court of Appeal recently provided welcome clarification on that question. The owner of a ground-floor flat wished to extend it by building out into his garden. He served notices on owners of adjoining properties, as required by the Party Wall etc. Act 1996. The works caused the rear wall of two adjoining properties to drop by about 2 mm, which led to internal walls and floor...

Challenge to Will's Validity Rejected by High Court

12th April, 2024 By

The best way to ensure your assets will be distributed as you wish is to have your will professionally drafted by a qualified solicitor. In a recent case, a challenge to the validity of an elderly man's will was dismissed by the High Court. The man had previously made a will in 2011, leaving most of his estate equally to his three children. In 2018, by which time one of his sons had predeceased him, he made a further will, leaving the residue of his estate to his other son...