fbpx

Vulnerable tenant protected from loss of liberty in noise nuisance dispute

11th August 2020 By Arman Khosravi

This week, Oliver Fisher’s trainee solicitor Olivia Doherty achieved an excellent result under severe time constraints in a noise nuisance dispute.

Details of the noise nuisance dispute

The client, who is considered disabled and suffers with extreme anxiety, depression, and PTSD, faces an anti-social behaviour injunction from his landlord for noise nuisance.

Typically, a client is represented from the beginning of their dispute. But in this instance, Oliver Fisher received instruction with just a week to obtain legal aid and prepare for the hearing.

Ms Doherty successfully obtained legal aid for the civil case. But at the last minute Doherty was notified that the nature of the hearing had changed. The hearing had become a decision as to whether to pursue an injunction or a committal hearing.

As a committal is a criminal not civil proceeding, Ms Doherty had just a day to obtain separate legal aid. And should the judge choose to pursue a committal hearing, the client would face time in prison.

Excellent result for vulnerable tenant

Ms Doherty’s last-minute aid application succeeded based on two key case merits.

  • The client had a potential defence under the 2010 Equality Act, which protects disabled people from unfair treatment.
  • The client was at risk of loss of liberty.

With legal aid obtained, the barrister working with Doherty, Mr Richard Granby, successfully negotiated with the claimant’s barrister to dismiss the committal case. This freed the client from the risk of loss of liberty.

At the hearing, the Judge directed Oliver Fisher to obtain medical evidence to prove the client’s disability. With this evidence, the Equality Act defence can be put forward at the injunction hearing in six weeks’ time.

Solicitor’s feedback

“Getting the committal dismissed was an excellent success for the client, as he could have lost his liberty” says Olivia Doherty.

“We now have the chance to fully prepare for the Injunction trial and with permission to obtain medical evidence, I’m confident that the client will be fairly represented. Given the time constraints we were under, I’m pleased the hearing had an extremely positive outcome.”

To find out more about how Oliver Fisher Solicitors could support you through a noise nuisance dispute, click here. To find out whether you are eligible for legal aid, click here.

Latest News

Retired Businessman's Final Will Ruled Invalid

2nd May, 2024 By

Having your will drawn up professionally by a qualified solicitor is always a sensible precaution, especially in later life. In a recent case, the High Court ruled that a retired businessman lacked testamentary capacity when he made a will less than three and a half years before he died at the age of 87. The man and his first wife were married for nearly 40 years and had four children. After her death he married again. In October 2015 he made a new will, revoking in most respects a will...

Company Owner's Negligible Value Claim Unsuccessful

29th April, 2024 By

When an asset falls in value to the point that it is almost worthless, it may be possible to make a negligible value claim under Section 24 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992. The asset will then be treated as if it had been sold and immediately acquired again, so that the loss can be set off against other income. For a claim to succeed, however, the asset must have become of negligible value during the time the claimant owned it. On 30 September 2017, a woman who...

Court Sanctions Leg Amputation for Man Lacking Mental Capacity

24th April, 2024 By

The courts are often called upon to sanction treatment for patients whose ability to make decisions for themselves is impaired. In a recent case on point, the Court of Protection had to decide whether it was in the best interests of a man with mental health issues to have his right leg amputated above the knee. The man, aged 60, was taken to hospital by his niece. He was found to have an ulcerated leg. He had a history of paranoid schizophrenia, and believed that the sores on his leg...

High Court Grants Parental Order Despite Previous Adoption

18th April, 2024 By

In law, adopted children are regarded as having been born to their adoptive parents. The Family Division of the High Court recently considered whether that fact precluded a parental order being granted under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (HFEA) in respect of a child born via surrogacy. A couple who lived in the USA had entered into a surrogacy arrangement with another woman. An adoption order naming the couple as the child's parents had been made by a US court and was automatically recognised under UK law. However,...