fbpx

Couple Overcome 'One House' Restriction to Build New Home in Their Garden

3rd December 2019 By

New homes built in the grounds of existing residences make a valuable contribution to meeting burgeoning housing demand. However, as a decision of the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) showed, restrictions lurking in antique title deeds can stand in the way of such projects.

A couple were granted planning permission to build a four-bedroom detached house in the garden of their home. However, their proposal came up against what appeared to be an immovable object in the form of a conveyance, dating back to 1954, which contained a common form of restrictive covenant that forbade construction of more than one house on the relevant land.

In coming to the couple’s aid, however, the FTT found that the development would cause no injury to the couple’s neighbours. Only one objection to the project had been received and that was subsequently withdrawn. Other nearby properties were subject to identical restrictions, yet new homes had been built in their gardens. The pattern of planning permissions and development in the locale had changed the character of the neighbourhood and the purpose of the covenant could thus no longer be fully achieved.

The FTT stopped short of discharging the covenant in its entirety on the basis that it continued to perform a useful function in preventing intrusive development which might well cause injury to others. However, the couple were granted an order under Section 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925, modifying the covenant to the extent required to enable construction of a house in accordance with the planning consent. If that permission had expired, the couple could seek a fresh consent from the local authority.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Retired Businessman's Final Will Ruled Invalid

2nd May, 2024 By

Having your will drawn up professionally by a qualified solicitor is always a sensible precaution, especially in later life. In a recent case, the High Court ruled that a retired businessman lacked testamentary capacity when he made a will less than three and a half years before he died at the age of 87. The man and his first wife were married for nearly 40 years and had four children. After her death he married again. In October 2015 he made a new will, revoking in most respects a will...

Company Owner's Negligible Value Claim Unsuccessful

29th April, 2024 By

When an asset falls in value to the point that it is almost worthless, it may be possible to make a negligible value claim under Section 24 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992. The asset will then be treated as if it had been sold and immediately acquired again, so that the loss can be set off against other income. For a claim to succeed, however, the asset must have become of negligible value during the time the claimant owned it. On 30 September 2017, a woman who...

Court Sanctions Leg Amputation for Man Lacking Mental Capacity

24th April, 2024 By

The courts are often called upon to sanction treatment for patients whose ability to make decisions for themselves is impaired. In a recent case on point, the Court of Protection had to decide whether it was in the best interests of a man with mental health issues to have his right leg amputated above the knee. The man, aged 60, was taken to hospital by his niece. He was found to have an ulcerated leg. He had a history of paranoid schizophrenia, and believed that the sores on his leg...

High Court Grants Parental Order Despite Previous Adoption

18th April, 2024 By

In law, adopted children are regarded as having been born to their adoptive parents. The Family Division of the High Court recently considered whether that fact precluded a parental order being granted under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (HFEA) in respect of a child born via surrogacy. A couple who lived in the USA had entered into a surrogacy arrangement with another woman. An adoption order naming the couple as the child's parents had been made by a US court and was automatically recognised under UK law. However,...